Recently I saw a conversation between Sean Carroll and Slavoj Zizek concerning the MWI.
One of the questions that drove Slavoj concerned with this question of Ontology vs. Epistemology, as the way Sean had described the current understanding of MWI is that we merely 'don't know' where we are on the wavefunction which seems to keep the openness of reality at the level of epistemology rather than ontology.
The question I have concerns entanglement with new information that an object encounters as it is coming in from outside the object's light cone. In my understanding when entanglement-measurement occurs, some pair (or more) objects in the wavefunction take on a correlated value, but then the price of this is that other values become randomized (so electrons take on opposite spins, but then the spin of each electron is not determined).
What I am wondering is as we pass from before the moment of entanglement with new information coming in from outside the lightcone to after that moment, some of the information will be consistent (or not consistent) with our current history - that information gets zipped with (or excluded from) the entanglement event, but all the sort of 'random' information that is really new... is it the case that the wavefunction of our object has a different space (or location on the wavefunction) for each of these random timelines before the encounter with new information - or is that space created at the moment of entanglement with the new information?
That is... is it the case that our original object is actually already always split into all of its future possible timelines in a way such that various points on its original wavefunction can be assigned to various final 'futures' - or is that split not possible in principle or in the mathematics from the beginning of the calculation (so that in reality many futures pass through the same original point on the wave function)?