5
$\begingroup$

In sec. 9.5 of Weinberg's QFT 1, he introduces operators $Q$ and $P$ satisfying $$ \{Q,P\}=i \tag{9.5.1} $$ $$ \{Q,Q\}=\{P,P\}=0 \tag{9.5.2} $$ and eigenstates $|q\rangle$: $$ Q|q\rangle =q|q\rangle \tag{9.5.14} $$ where $q$ is a Grassmann number. The Grassmann $q$ is taken to satisfy $$ \{Q,q\}=\{P,q\}=\{q',q\}=0. \tag{9.5.16} $$ The two basis states in the Hilbert space are $|0\rangle$ and $|1\rangle$, satisfying $$ Q|0\rangle=0\tag{9.5.8} $$ $$ P|0\rangle=|1\rangle.\tag{9.5.9} $$ However, there is a problem when I try to evaluate $$\langle 0|QPq|0\rangle.$$

  1. on the one hand, using $\{Q,P\}=i$, I get $iq$;

  2. on the other hand, using $$\langle 0|Q=i\langle 1|\tag{9.5.12}$$ and $\{P,q\}=0$, I get $-iq$.

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

Hints:

  1. OP's first method is correct. For clarity, it should probably be noted that it implicitly uses that the fermionic eigenvalue $q$ commutes with the bosonic state $|0\rangle$.

  2. For OP's second method remember that the fermionic eigenvalue $q$ anticommutes with the fermionic state $|1\rangle$. This gives an additional minus sign.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.