In Susskind's Particles and Fields lecture, he considered the Lagrangian obtained by considering a particle and the effects of a scalar field $\phi(t, x)$ with coupling constant $g$ on the particle (20:45) as follows: $$\int L_P \ dt = \int -(m + g\phi)\sqrt{1 - \dot{x}^2} \ dt,$$ where the speed of light $c=1$ is one. Then, he considered the traditional Lagrangian of a field, and added the effect of a stationary particle (with $\sqrt{1 - \dot{x}^2} = 1$) on the field from the previous Lagrangian (41:37): $$\int L_F \ dx \ dt = \int \left[\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}\right)^2 - \frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x}\right)^2 + g\phi \delta(x)\right]\ dx \ dt.$$ I understand the use of $\delta(x)$ (the Dirac delta function) to rewrite the field in the context of the double integral, and that $m$ can be discarded for the purposes of determining the equations of motion, since it will vanish in the Euler-Lagrange equations. But I have two questions:
How did Susskind simply take the effect of the field on the particle in $L_P$ and insert it into $L_F$ to represent the effect of the particle on the field? I very vaguely understood it as a sort of "action-reaction" pair, but I would like to know a more rigorous treatment of this insertion and why it works for Lagrangians.
Susskind mentions that there is only one action for this system (29:09). Is he saying that since both equations describe the same system, both result in the same action? I would like a clarification about what he's referring to when he says that.