4
$\begingroup$

In particle mechanics Lagrangian $L$ depends upon position, velocity (and may be explicitly on time), whereas in field theory the Lagrangian density ${\cal L}$ similarly (or analogously) depends upon the field and its derivatives. When we derive Euler-Lagrange equation of motion we vary the action,

In particle mechanics, $$\delta S=\int_{t_1}^{t_2}~\mathrm dt\left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial q}~\delta q+\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}}~\delta \dot{q}\right)\tag{1}$$

In field theory, $$\delta S=\int_\sigma~\mathrm d^4x\left(\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \phi}~\delta \phi+\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial _\mu \phi)}~\delta \partial_\mu \phi\right).\tag{2}$$

Now, Lagrangian is a functional, it maps functions (position, velocity or fields and their derivatives) into another function (or a real number). Like, $$L:F×F→F;(q(t),\dot{q}(t))↦L[q(t),\dot{q}(t)]. \tag{3}$$ So my question is that are the partial derivatives of the Lagrangian w.r.t. position and velocity functions or fields and their derivatives functional derivatives?

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

4
$\begingroup$

Yes, OP is right. In the field-theoretic case, the partial derivatives in OP's first formula (1) should be replaced with functional derivatives

$$ \delta S~=~\int_{t_1}^{t_2}\!\mathrm{d}t\left(\frac{\delta L}{\delta q}~\delta q+\left. \frac{\delta L}{\delta v}\right|_{v=\dot{q}}~\delta \dot{q}\right),\tag{1'}$$

where the Lagrangian

$$L[q(\cdot,t),v(\cdot,t);t]~=\int \! \mathrm d^3x~ {\cal L}(q(x,t),v(x,t), ~\partial_x q(x,t), \partial_x v(x,t),~\ldots , t) $$

is a functional. The ellipsis $\ldots$ indicates dependence of possible higher-order derivatives. See my Phys.SE answers here and here for further details.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

This is just supplementing Qmechanic's answer. I think the notations here need to be addressed. OP might be confusing Lagrangian (normal $L$) with Lagrangian density ($\mathcal{L}$). Formally, we have three fundamental relations: $$L = \displaystyle\int \mathcal{L}(\phi(x,t),\dot \phi(x,t),x,t) \mathrm d^3x$$ $$S = \displaystyle\int dt \space L = \displaystyle\int dt\int \mathcal{L}(\phi(x,t),\dot \phi(x,t),x,t) \mathrm d^3x$$ $$\delta S=\displaystyle\int_\sigma~\mathrm d^4x\left(\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \phi}~\delta \phi+\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial _\mu \phi)}~\delta \partial_\mu \phi\right).\tag{2}$$ (x actually means all spatial variables in the equations above)

So you would take partial derivatives on Lagrangian density $\mathcal{L}$, but take functional derivatives on the Lagrangian $L$. However, in general: $$ \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \phi} \neq \frac{\delta L}{\delta \phi}$$ For derivation of this inequality, see this SE answer.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.