0
$\begingroup$

I am reading Peter Woit's book Quantum Theory, Groups and Representations, section 10.1 (a similar version can be found here). I am reading the part where he introduces the representation of $(\mathbb{R},+)$ on $L^2(\mathbb{R}).$ He said the following:

The simplest case is the representation induced on functions on $\mathbb{R}$ by the action of $\mathbb{R}$ on itself by translation. Here, $a\in \mathbb{R}$ acts on $q\in \mathbb{R}$ (where $q$ is a coordinate on $\mathbb{R}$) by $$q\to a\cdot q=q+a,$$ which induces a representation $\pi:\mathbb{R}\to GL(L^2(\mathbb{R}))$ given by $$\pi(g)f(q)=f(g^{-1}\cdot q)$$ for which this case will be $$\pi(a)f(q)=f(q-a).$$ To get the Lie algebra version of this representation, the above can be differentiated, finding $$\pi'(a)=-a\frac{d}{dq}.$$

My Question: I don't see how to go from $\pi(a)f(q)=f(q-a)$ to $\pi'(a)=-a\frac{d}{dq}.$ I would appreciate if someone can explain it to me. Here is what I have done so far:

By definition, the derivative $\pi'$ of the induced Lie algebra representation is related to the Lie group representation via $$\pi'(X)=\frac{d}{dt}\pi(e^{tX})|_{t=0}.$$

Therefore, we have that

$$ \pi'(a)f(q)=\frac{d}{dt}\pi(e^{ta})f(q)|_{t=0}=\frac{d}{dt}f((-e^{ta})\cdot q)|_{t=0}=\frac{d}{dt}f(q-e^{ta})|_{t=0}=[f'(q-e^{ta})(-ae^{ta})]_{t=0}=-af'(q-1). $$

So I didn't get the expected answer. Instead, I get a shift of the derivative $f'(q-1)$, but it should have been $f'(q)$.

Another method I try to use is by defining $$\pi'(a)=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{\pi(a+h)-\pi(a)}{h}.$$ But in the end I get $\pi'(a)f(q)=-f'(q-a).$ Another different answer, which is very weird. So I must have made some silly mistakes in my work.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Would Mathematics be a better home for this question? $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Sep 4, 2022 at 2:54
  • $\begingroup$ @Qmechanic Oops sorry, I thought since this is essentially how Peter Woit gets the momentum operator from a unitary representation of the group $\mathbb{R}$, this should be asked as a physics question. I can delete this post if needed. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 4, 2022 at 3:27

2 Answers 2

6
$\begingroup$

You must be careful - remember that the Lie algebra is given by the tangent space to the Lie group at the identity element. The identity element of $G=(\mathbb R,+)$ is not $1\in \mathbb R$ but rather $0\in \mathbb R$. There are two ways to study this somewhat odd case clearly. We may either implement $G$ as a matrix group, or we may treat it as a smooth manifold.

The former is simpler. Define $$G := \left\{\pmatrix{1&a\\0&1}\in \mathbb R_{2\times 2}\ \bigg | \ a\in \mathbb R\right\}\simeq (\mathbb R,+)$$ In this form, the group operation is given by matrix multiplication, since $$ \pmatrix{1&a\\0&1} \pmatrix{1&b\\0&1} = \pmatrix{1&a+b\\0&1}$$ Letting $a$ be infinitesimal, we find that the Lie algebra takes the form $$\mathfrak g := \left\{\pmatrix{0&a\\0&0}\ \bigg| \ a\in \mathbb R\right\} \simeq (\mathbb R,+)$$ The exponential map is then straightforwardly given by $$\exp\left(\pmatrix{0&a\\0&0}\right)= \pmatrix{1&a\\0&1}$$ Observe that both $G$ and $\mathfrak g$ are isomorphic to $(\mathbb R,+)$ - the former as a group, and the latter as a vector space - and that $G\ni \pmatrix{1&a\\0&1}$ and $\mathfrak g\ni \pmatrix{0&a\\0&0}$ may be identified with $a\in \mathbb R$. This suggests - somewhat counterintuitively - that we might write $\exp(a) = a$, where the exponential map is (clearly) not the familiar exponential from elementary analysis.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ That makes perfect sense! Thank you! Since you mentioned treating $\mathbb{R}$ as a smooth manifold, can we also argue as follows? The map $\text{exp}$ takes a vector $a\in T_0 \mathbb{R}$ to $\gamma_a(1)$, where $\gamma_a(t)$ is the unique geodesic $\gamma_a(t)$ on $\mathbb{R}$ with $\gamma_a(0)=0,\gamma_a'(0)=a$, which is just the constant curve with initial velocity $a$. Therefore $\text{exp}(a)=a$? $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 4, 2022 at 3:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @TianyiWang Yes, that's precisely the other option. Though one should be careful to say that it's not a geodesic (a curve of extremal length) but rather an integral curve of the left-invariant vector field whose element at $T_0\mathbb R$ is $a$. This is of course just a constant vector field. And indeed, if we equip $\mathbb R$ with the metric $\langle a,b\rangle = ab$ then this curve will be a geodesic as well, but it's important I think to keep the concepts distinct. $\endgroup$
    – J. Murray
    Commented Sep 4, 2022 at 3:26
  • $\begingroup$ I see! Thank you! $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 4, 2022 at 3:29
1
$\begingroup$

$\pi(a) f(q)=f(q- a) \approx f(q) - f'(q) a$

$\pi(a) = e^{-a \frac{\partial}{\partial q}} \approx 1- a\frac{\partial}{\partial q}$

$\pi'(a) |_{a=0} = - \frac{\partial}{\partial q} e^{-a \frac{\partial}{\partial q}}|_{a=0}\approx -\frac{\partial}{\partial q}$

Physics From Symmetry. Jakob Schwictenberg. Page 40.

Physics From Finance. Jakob Schwictenberg. Page 160.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.