1
$\begingroup$

Consider a body arbitrarily loaded as shown,

enter image description here

At a particular point in the body, I take an element and show all the stresses acting on its faces.

enter image description here

To specify a plane I will be using the the axis which is perpendicular to it. For instance, the front face is the +z face and the face opposite to the +z face is the -z face.

All the sources that I follow, state that the normal stress acting on the +z and -z face will be equal. Similarly, the normal stress on the faces +x and -x as well as +y and -y face will be equal. However, I feel that might not necessarily be the case.

The normal stress on the +z and -z face, can be different, but could be such that theses normal stresses along with the shear stresses acting along z direction, on the +y,-y and +x, -x faces vectorially sum to zero, so that equilibrium is maintained along the z direction.

$$\sigma_z - \sigma_z' + \tau_{xz} - \tau_{xz}' + \tau_{yz} - \tau_{yz}' = 0$$

Same arguments can hold true for equilibrium along x and y directions.

So, it might not be necessary that the normal stresses on opposite faces are equal, then why in the general state of stress at a point they are shown equal?

A similar question was asked here

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

The point is that the claimed identity is valid in the limit of vanishing size $2\delta$ of the considered cubic element. If the element is cetered on the origin and you consider two opposite faces, e.g., normal to the axis $z$, you have, assuming that the stress tensor is differentiable at the origin, $$\sigma(0,0,\pm\delta) \cdot {\bf e}_z= \sigma(0,0,0)\cdot {\bf e}_z + O_\pm(\delta)\:.$$ At this order of approximation, the stresses on the two opposite faces are equal in norm and have opposite directions (since the normal outward vectors are opposite: $\pm {\bf e}_z$).

Since what I wrote above concerns the stresses as vectors, not only the normal components of the stresses are equal in norm, but also the tangential components are: $$\sigma_{az}(0,0,z)= \sigma_{az}(0,0,-z)+ O(\delta)$$ for $a=x,y,z$. Since this argument applies to each pair of opposite faces, in your equation $$(\sigma_z - \sigma_z') + (\tau_{xz} - \tau_{xz}') + (\tau_{yz} - \tau_{yz}') \simeq 0$$ the three differences vanish separately with the said approximation.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks Valter, that helped. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 22, 2022 at 13:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.