Consider a body arbitrarily loaded as shown,
At a particular point in the body, I take an element and show all the stresses acting on its faces.
To specify a plane I will be using the the axis which is perpendicular to it. For instance, the front face is the +z face and the face opposite to the +z face is the -z face.
All the sources that I follow, state that the normal stress acting on the +z and -z face will be equal. Similarly, the normal stress on the faces +x and -x as well as +y and -y face will be equal. However, I feel that might not necessarily be the case.
The normal stress on the +z and -z face, can be different, but could be such that theses normal stresses along with the shear stresses acting along z direction, on the +y,-y and +x, -x faces vectorially sum to zero, so that equilibrium is maintained along the z direction.
$$\sigma_z - \sigma_z' + \tau_{xz} - \tau_{xz}' + \tau_{yz} - \tau_{yz}' = 0$$
Same arguments can hold true for equilibrium along x and y directions.
So, it might not be necessary that the normal stresses on opposite faces are equal, then why in the general state of stress at a point they are shown equal?