-1
$\begingroup$

I very well understand that a lot of people have asked the question "where does potential energy come from" on this site, but mine is more of clarification.

If an object was propelled from the ground to a certain height h, it's potential energy at that height (h) is said to be mgh. Since the final K.E and initial K.E is 0, total work done is also 0. Hence why is P.E = mgh and not 0. I have a possible explanation, but I'm not exactly sure. The force required to propel an object on the ground, to a height (h) , has to be greater than it's weight. Let's label this extra force f', therefore;

F= mg+f'. Where F is the propelling force.

Hence the work done by this force is;

W= mgh+f'h

According to the work-energy theorem,

Kf-Ki= Net work done

Net work done = Net force * distance

Net force = weight+ propelling force

.'. Net force= -mg+mg+f'

Hence: Net force= f'

.'. Net work done= f'h

Therefore Kf-Ki= f'h

Since Kf and Ki = 0,

f'h= 0

Recall, Work done= mgh + f'h

Since f'h=0,

Work done = mgh.

Is any of this correct? If not, Where did I go wrong?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ You have not described the situation $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 24, 2021 at 8:54
  • $\begingroup$ I've edited it already. $\endgroup$
    – Taofeek
    Commented Jan 24, 2021 at 9:01

3 Answers 3

1
$\begingroup$

Suppose the object starts out at height $0$ with an initial vertical velocity $u$. So it's kinetic energy at height $0$, which we will denote by $KE(0)$ is $\frac 1 2 mu^2$. We don't know its potential energy at height $0$, but we will just call this $PE(0)$.

We know that the object is decelerating at a rate of $-g$ due to gravity. If its velocity at height $h$ is $v(h)$ then its velocity at height $h$ is given by

$v^2(h) = v^2(0) - 2gh = u^2 - 2gh$

so its kinetic energy at height $h$ is

$KE(h) = \frac 1 2 m v^2(h) = \frac 1 2 m(u^2 - 2gh) = \frac 1 2 mu^2 - mgh = KE(0) - mgh$

From conservation of energy we know that

$PE(h) + KE(h) = PE(0) + KE(0) \\ \Rightarrow PE(h) = PE(0) + KE(0) - KE(h) = PE(0) + \frac 1 2 mu^2 - (\frac 1 2 mu^2 - mgh) = PE(0) + mgh$

We still don't know $PE(0)$, but we do know that the difference in potential energy between height $0$ and height $h$ is $\Delta PE = PE(h) - PE(0) = mgh$. So, no matter what value we assign to $PE(0)$, we know that the additional potential energy that the object has at height $h$ is $mgh$.

Alternatively, you can think of the change in potential energy as being the negative of the work done by gravity on the object between height $0$ and height $h$. We sometimes call this the work done against gravity.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

First, here potential energy means gravitational potential energy. It is numerically equal to the work done by the(conservative) gravitational field, and not equal to the change in kinetic energies( except when the object is in free fall).The work energy theorem implies that the work done by all the forces acting on the body is equal to the change in kinetic energy of the body. Regarding the calculation, you have assumed the force to be constant, but if the force is constant, the object would continue moving without coming to rest. You must assume a variable force such that work done by the force is 0 for the equations to be valid. Also its not that the initial and final kinetic energies have to be zero, its their change that has to be zero. If you lift an object from the ground up, gravitational force would do negative work on it, and hence the object would gain GPE.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I actually made a mistake in the write-up, I meant to write "change" in kinetic energy. Can this be proved mathematically? I mean, can we mathematically work our way to getting "net work done= mgh" ? If so how? $\endgroup$
    – Taofeek
    Commented Jan 24, 2021 at 9:35
  • $\begingroup$ The net work done is not mgh. Net work done is equal to 0 only. What i'm saying is that potential energy= work done by gravity( not the net work done). This can be demonstrated by free fall motion. When an object falls, we say that " potential energy of body gets converted into kinetic energy", this is basically another way of saying that work done by gravity is equal to kinetic energy of the body. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 24, 2021 at 12:06
1
$\begingroup$

If an object was propelled from the ground to a certain height h, it's potential energy at that height (h) is said to be mgh. Since the final K.E and initial K.E is 0, total work done is also 0

If you assume that at height $h$, it doesn't have any kinetic energy, you can say initial kinetic energy is transferred to potential energy. Here what you should be careful is that when you throw an object with some velocity $v$, it doesn't have zero initial kinetic energy. Therefore, the potential energy is not zero at height $h$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.