Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
Qmechanic
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k
Corrected grammar
Source Link
Taofeek
  • 117
  • 11

I very well understand that a lot of people have asked the question "where does potential energy come from" on this site, but mine is more of clarification.

If an object was propelled from the ground to a certain height h, it's potential energy at that height (h) is said to be mgh. Since the final K.E and initial K.E is 0, total work done is also 0. Hence why is P.E = mgh and not 0?. I have a possible explanation for it, but I'm not exactly sure. The force required to propel an object on the ground, to a height (h) , has to be greater than it's weight. Let's label this extra force f', therefore;

F= mg+f'. Where F is the propelling force.

Hence the work done by this force is;

W= mgh+f'h

According to the work-energy theorem,

Kf-Ki= Net work done

Net work done = Net force * distance

Net force = weight+ propelling force

.'. Net force= -mg+mg+f'

Hence: Net force= f'

.'. Net work done= f'h

Therefore Kf-Ki= f'h

Since Kf and Ki = 0,

f'h= 0

Recall, Work done= mgh + f'h

Since f'h=0,

Work done = mgh.

Is any of this correct? If not, Where did I go wrong?

I very well understand that a lot of people have asked the question "where does potential energy come from" on this site, but mine is more of clarification.

Since the final K.E and initial K.E is 0, total work done is also 0. Hence why is P.E = mgh and not 0? I have a possible explanation for it but I'm not exactly sure. The force required to propel an object on the ground, to a height (h) , has to be greater than it's weight. Let's label this extra force f', therefore;

F= mg+f'. Where F is the propelling force.

Hence the work done by this force is;

W= mgh+f'h

According to the work-energy theorem,

Kf-Ki= Net work done

Net work done = Net force * distance

Net force = weight+ propelling force

.'. Net force= -mg+mg+f'

Hence: Net force= f'

.'. Net work done= f'h

Therefore Kf-Ki= f'h

Since Kf and Ki = 0,

f'h= 0

Recall, Work done= mgh + f'h

Since f'h=0,

Work done = mgh.

Is any of this correct? If not, Where did I go wrong?

I very well understand that a lot of people have asked the question "where does potential energy come from" on this site, but mine is more of clarification.

If an object was propelled from the ground to a certain height h, it's potential energy at that height (h) is said to be mgh. Since the final K.E and initial K.E is 0, total work done is also 0. Hence why is P.E = mgh and not 0. I have a possible explanation, but I'm not exactly sure. The force required to propel an object on the ground, to a height (h) , has to be greater than it's weight. Let's label this extra force f', therefore;

F= mg+f'. Where F is the propelling force.

Hence the work done by this force is;

W= mgh+f'h

According to the work-energy theorem,

Kf-Ki= Net work done

Net work done = Net force * distance

Net force = weight+ propelling force

.'. Net force= -mg+mg+f'

Hence: Net force= f'

.'. Net work done= f'h

Therefore Kf-Ki= f'h

Since Kf and Ki = 0,

f'h= 0

Recall, Work done= mgh + f'h

Since f'h=0,

Work done = mgh.

Is any of this correct? If not, Where did I go wrong?

Source Link
Taofeek
  • 117
  • 11

Confirmation on Potential energy of an object

I very well understand that a lot of people have asked the question "where does potential energy come from" on this site, but mine is more of clarification.

Since the final K.E and initial K.E is 0, total work done is also 0. Hence why is P.E = mgh and not 0? I have a possible explanation for it but I'm not exactly sure. The force required to propel an object on the ground, to a height (h) , has to be greater than it's weight. Let's label this extra force f', therefore;

F= mg+f'. Where F is the propelling force.

Hence the work done by this force is;

W= mgh+f'h

According to the work-energy theorem,

Kf-Ki= Net work done

Net work done = Net force * distance

Net force = weight+ propelling force

.'. Net force= -mg+mg+f'

Hence: Net force= f'

.'. Net work done= f'h

Therefore Kf-Ki= f'h

Since Kf and Ki = 0,

f'h= 0

Recall, Work done= mgh + f'h

Since f'h=0,

Work done = mgh.

Is any of this correct? If not, Where did I go wrong?