3
$\begingroup$

Consider that we are working with a joint system composed of system A with basis $|\alpha_j\rangle$ and system B with basis $|\beta_j\rangle$, we may write a general density matrix for the joint system with respect to tensor product basis $|\alpha_j\rangle |\beta_j\rangle$.

I want to understand then how we can deduce that the density operator can be written as follows.

$$\rho = \sum_{j,k,l,m} \langle\alpha_j| \langle\beta_k |\rho |\alpha_l\rangle |\beta_m\rangle |\alpha_j\rangle |\beta_k\rangle \langle\alpha_l| \langle \beta_m|$$

Any help to facilitate my understanding of this would be greatly appreciated.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I don't quite see the difference between this question and this other one physics.stackexchange.com/q/596995/58382 $\endgroup$ – glS Nov 30 '20 at 10:45
  • $\begingroup$ The other question asks about how to find the reduced density operator by taking the trace. $\endgroup$ – DJA Nov 30 '20 at 13:21
  • $\begingroup$ you might want to edit the title to reflect what you are actually asking then $\endgroup$ – glS Nov 30 '20 at 16:27
5
$\begingroup$

If $\big\{|\alpha_j\rangle\big\}$ is a basis for the Hilbert space $\mathcal H_A$ and $\big\{|\beta_k\rangle\big\}$ is a basis for $\mathcal H_B$, then $\big\{|\alpha_j,\beta_k\rangle \big\}$ is a basis for $\mathcal H_A \otimes \mathcal H_B$, the natural Hilbert space for the composite system. To lighten the notation, I am defining $|\alpha_j,\beta_k\rangle \equiv |\alpha_j\rangle \otimes |\beta_k \rangle$.

From there, the identity operator on $\mathcal H_A \otimes \mathcal H_B$ can be written $$\mathbf 1 = \sum_{j,k} |\alpha_j,\beta_k\rangle\langle\alpha_j,\beta_k|$$

so an arbitrary operator $T$ can be written

$$T = \mathbf 1 \cdot T \cdot \mathbf 1 = \bigg(\sum_{j,k} |\alpha_j,\beta_k\rangle\langle\alpha_j,\beta_k|\bigg) T \bigg(\sum_{\ell,m} |\alpha_\ell,\beta_m\rangle\langle \alpha_\ell,\beta_m|\bigg)$$ $$ = \sum_{j,k,\ell,m}T_{jk\ell m} |\alpha_j,\beta_k\rangle\langle \alpha_\ell,\beta_m|$$

where $$T_{jk\ell m} \equiv \langle \alpha_j,\beta_k| T | \alpha_\ell,\beta_m\rangle$$

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Short answer: apply both sides of the equation to an arbitrary ket basis vector, and things will simplify a lot.

The truth of that equation doesn't have anything to do with the fact that it's a joint system, or that it is a density operator. It would be true for any operator, and any orthonormal basis.

After you apply both sides of the equation to a basis vector, one way to proceed is to flip the two terms and use the resolution of identity.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.