In a Classical Mechanics book I found the assumption that for an arbitrary particle with constant mass in the Real line $dT/dx=0$, with T the Kinetic Energy i.e. $T=(m·\dot x^2)/2$
My hypothesis is that the author used the following 'identity' $$d\dot x^2/dx=0$$
But solving the differential equation (correct me if I am wrong please) I get to $\dot x=f(t)$
Which I think could wrong because it could be that $\dot x=f(x,t)$ couldn't it?