3
$\begingroup$

When we write kinetic energy for orbital mechanics, we usually write

$$ K= \frac{1}{2} m \dot{r}^2 + \frac{1}{2}m r^2 \dot{\phi}^2$$

I understand the first term is the tangent velocity along the ellipse but what is the second term? My direct interpretation of it would be the energy in rotating the velocity vector as the particle moves along the path. However, if I recall correctly rotating forces does no work? Or, in other words $$ P = F_{normal} \cdot v = 0 $$ because the normal force to velocity which turns it to allign with path is perpendicular to velocity, wouldn't dot product with it be zero?

$\endgroup$
5
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ the first term is the tangent velocity along the ellipse No. To see that it isn’t, consider the circular case. $\endgroup$
    – G. Smith
    Commented Jul 26, 2020 at 20:14
  • $\begingroup$ Hm good point that radius isn't changing, so it must be zero $\endgroup$
    – Brian
    Commented Jul 26, 2020 at 20:20
  • $\begingroup$ Your second term is missing an $m$. $\endgroup$
    – G. Smith
    Commented Jul 26, 2020 at 20:20
  • $\begingroup$ another good point you have made $\endgroup$
    – Brian
    Commented Jul 26, 2020 at 20:20
  • $\begingroup$ i have fixed it now $\endgroup$
    – Brian
    Commented Jul 26, 2020 at 20:20

3 Answers 3

4
$\begingroup$

If you write a position vector using polar coordinates like $$\vec{u}(t) = r(t) \left( \hat{x}\cos\phi(t) + \hat{y} \sin\phi(t) \right)$$ then the magnitude of the squared velocity is $$ \begin{eqnarray} ||\dot{\vec{u}}||^2 & = & ||\dot{r} \left( \hat{x}\cos\phi + \hat{y} \sin\phi \right) + r \dot{\phi}\left( -\hat{x}\sin\phi + \hat{y} \cos\phi \right)||^2 \\ & = & \left(\dot{r}\cos(\phi)-r\dot{\phi}\sin\phi\right)^2 + \left( \dot{r}\sin\phi + r\dot{\phi}\cos\phi\right)^2 \\ & = & \dot{r}^2+r^2\dot{\phi}^2 \end{eqnarray} $$

Your expression for $K$ is just $\frac{1}{2}m v^2$ with the above expression for $v^2$.

The $\dot{r}$ term represents the motion radially out from the center of the coordinate system, and the $\dot{\phi}$ term is motion in a circle around the center.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

It's a consequence of expressing the speed, $v$, in polar coordinates: $$v = \dot{r} \hat{r} + r \dot{\phi} \hat{\phi} \implies v^2 = \dot{r}^2 + r^2 \dot{\phi}^2.$$ If you want to make intuitive sense of what either term means, think of how position is described in polar coordinates: the radial vector denotes how far away from the origin an object is, whereas the polar angle describes its angular orientation about the origin. In the expression for $v^2$, the first term relates to how fast the object is moving out radially -- for instance, in circular motion with constant radius, $\dot{r} = 0$. The second term, on the other hand, describes how fast the $angular$ component is changing. In the same example, if the object has an angular velocity $\dot{\phi} = \omega,$ then $v = r \omega$, which is a familiar relation.

$\endgroup$
2
2
$\begingroup$

The sketches below should help make this less mysterious.

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ The hardest concept here is treating the angle as a vector $\endgroup$
    – Brian
    Commented Jul 27, 2020 at 5:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DDD4C4U: $\hat\phi$ is just a unit vector in the direction in which $\phi$ increases. $\endgroup$
    – user26872
    Commented Jul 27, 2020 at 5:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.