2
$\begingroup$

I want to ask about the meaning of rotating the frame in quantum mechanics.

Many papers write the rotating frame and I'm not sure what the meaning of it.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Rotating the axes of the coordinate system. $\endgroup$
    – G. Smith
    Commented Feb 19, 2020 at 6:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Which papers? Which pages? $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Feb 19, 2020 at 7:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Qmechanic Does “transforming to a rotating frame” mean something different from “transforming to a coordinate system whose axes are in uniform rotation”? $\endgroup$
    – G. Smith
    Commented Feb 21, 2020 at 17:36
  • $\begingroup$ @G.Smith not necessarily "uniform" rotation, physics.stackexchange.com/q/630781/226902 $\endgroup$
    – Quillo
    Commented Feb 16, 2022 at 11:37

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

It is essentially equivalent to going to the “interaction picture” with respect to some hamiltonian. For instance, let's say we have a Hamiltonian that can be broken down to two pieces-

$H = H_0 + V(t)$

In the Schrodinger picture, we know that any state $|\psi (t)\rangle$ will evolve under the Schrodinger equation given by $i\hbar\dot{|\psi (t)\rangle} = H |\psi (t)\rangle$. In the Heisenberg picture, we consider the states to be stationary, however, the operators evolve with time. The interaction picture is somewhat in between, where we consider the states to evolve under some part of the hamiltonian ($V(t)$), and the operators to evolve under the rest ($H_0$). You can mathematically show the evolutions to be like this-

$i\hbar\dot{|\psi (t)\rangle_I} = V_I(t) |\psi (t)\rangle_I$

$i\hbar\dot{A_I} = [A_I, H_0]$

where $A_I = U^{\dagger}A U$ and $U = \exp{(-\frac{iH_0t}{\hbar})}$

With this processes, we have basically simplified some parts of the evolution of the system (evolution due to $H_0$) and focus on the more interesting parts ($V(t)$). This is similar to the case where a classical object is going through a complex motion along with some simple rotation, and you can basically focus on the complex motion by going to the rotating frame with the same frequency.

I'll give you one simple example to understand this. Let's say we have a hamiltonian like this-

$H = \hbar \omega \sigma_z + \hbar \frac{\Omega}{2} (\exp(i\omega t) + \exp(-i\omega t))\sigma_x$.

If we take $H_0 = \hbar \omega \sigma_z$ and $V(t) = \hbar \frac{\Omega}{2} (\exp(i\omega t) + \exp(-i\omega t))\sigma_x$ and go to the interaction picture with $H_0$, we can show that the term $V(t)$ in the interaction picture will be- $\hbar \frac{\Omega}{2} \sigma_x (1+ \exp(2i\omega t))$. Usually, the $\exp{(2i\omega t)}$ term implies a faster rotating term, which we can safely ignore as it violates energy conservation. Thus, in the rotating frame, our state only evolves with the simple $\hbar \frac{\Omega}{2}\sigma_x$, which makes the calculations a lot easier.

Answers in this thread- What is the "interaction picture" or "rotating frame" in quantum mechanics? discusses the underlying math nicely.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.