# Why is there a "blue hour" after the "golden hour"?

There's a great story about why the sky is blue during the day, and turns golden during sunsets:

Rayleigh scattering affects blue light more. During the day, blue light from the Sun is scattered towards us from all directions, causing a blue sky. During the sunset, the length of atmosphere the light from the Sun has to travel through becomes so long that the blue is depleted, giving the sky a golden color.

However, it seems this can't be the full story, because photographers know that after sunset, there is a so-called blue hour where the color of the sky becomes a deep blue again. Why would the color go from blue to golden to blue again?

Wikipedia states very strongly that explanations of this in terms of Rayleigh scattering are wrong, and that the real explanation is the absorption of blue light by ozone. But it doesn't explain why that would create the effect. If the blue light is not reemitted, then this just amounts to having less blue light, so it can't explain why the blue hour is more blue. And if the blue light is reemitted, then the effect of ozone should qualitatively be very similar to the effect of Rayleigh scattering, since it's just another scattering route that favors blue light, leading us back to the original puzzle.

What's the right explanation for the blue hour?

## 3 Answers

Wikipedia states very strongly that explanations of this in terms of Rayleigh scattering are wrong, and that the real explanation is the absorption of blue light by ozone.

Ozone doesn't absorb blue light (much): on the contrary, it absorbs red light much more, thus making the sky look blue. See in particular my answer for the question at Chemistry.SE: What exact color does ozone gas have?. Here's spectral cross section of ozone absorption in the visible(+NIR) range — the Chappuis band:

To the comment:

Could you explain why the effect of ozone is more important after sunset? Why doesn't this change the story during sunset, or during the day?

During the day sunlight passes much smaller distances through the atmosphere, thus is absorbed less. For the same reason it's reddened less by Rayleigh scattering, leaving more blue light to make the sky blue. Thus ozone has much smaller effect on daytime sky.

During sunset much of the sunlight passes through the troposphere, getting redder, while getting scattered into the observer more than from the stratosphere where most of the ozone layer is located (due to higher concentration of air molecules). So the ozone absorption effect is also less pronounced.

And at twilight the Earth's shadow prevents light from passing through troposphere, making the only light visible scattered from the stratosphere and above, and this light in large part gets there through the ozone layer, traversing it through the long dimension.

I have actually tested this ozone explanation of blue hour, using the Precomputed Atmospheric Scattering code to render two versions of the same scene: one for atmosphere with an ozone layer and another without any ozone. Here are the renderings of the Belt of Venus (ignore the white sphere in the center, it's just an irrelevant part of the demo scene):

With ozone layer (the normal Earth atmosphere):

Without any ozone:

• @knzhou I have personally experienced a "green moment" in the north in the region near Polar day. This isn't any known and described phenomenon, but I was observing this by my self because of the interest to these issues. Of course this all should be measured properly etc, but I consider this speaks for the idea of Scattering being the main explanation to this phenomenon. Jan 5, 2020 at 1:11
• During the day sunlight passes much smaller distances through the atmosphere, thus is absorbed less. For the same reason it's reddened less by Rayleigh scattering, leaving more blue light to make the sky blue. – I think this isn't worded or explained well. If the light was neither blued, neither reddened, they daytime sky would be white/yellow, not blue. I guess you have it almost right, but this paragraph could be improved. May 9, 2022 at 21:09
• @user1079505 this paragraph describes extinction. The light passed is indeed whiter. But this is what you'd observe if you looked at the Sun. What defines the diffuse sky color is, additionally to extinction, actual scattering of this extincted light into the observer, and this is where the Rayleigh $\lambda^{-4}$ factor comes into play to make the light blue. May 9, 2022 at 22:33

The Chappuis absorption bands occur at wavelengths between 400 and 650 nm. Within this range are two absorption maxima of similar height at 575 and 603 nm wavelengths

As seen here in the optical wavelengths , most of the visible light on the left of 500nm is absorbed, due to the large absorption lines leaving dominant the blue sector.

In ancient times in the middle east , people had variable length of days, and they counted the 12 hours from the time between the lines separating the golden/rose in the sky morning and evening ( mostly desert climate). I think the Muslim religion still does that. Actually it is the shadow of the earth on the atmosphere where the diffused light survives for a while, that is why it can be a line, if the weather is clear.

The reason is the same as in rainbow; different colours (wavelenghts)bends differently (sorry my language).

This Blue hour is the sunlight which arrives below the horizon. The reason why other light doesn't is on their wavelength. The Blue light can bend the most, and thus it can still reaches the Earth surface an hour after sunset, while green, yellow and red are already going above our heads.

This picture form german language Wikipedia on topic "Grüner Blitz" pretty much explains the issue. So there actually even is a green flash between "golden hour" (Red-orange-Yellow) and the blue hour.

• Atmospheric refraction is pretty negligible when discussing the colors of the sky. Even more so the dispersion of refractive index. Jan 4, 2020 at 21:36
• @Ruslan Well, Yes, that's why these phenomenons are lasting only short time. Ie. the Green flash of sun is only seconds. Yet when you get high latitudes, these times gets longer. I am from Finnland and there this "Blue moment" is so remarkably long, and is used even inproduct brands and in their TV-commercials (it's still not an hour, it's just a moment) youtube.com/watch?v=dUsdpMyr2_k Jan 4, 2020 at 21:56
• Blue hour lasts tens of minutes to multiple hours depending on latitude. Nowhere does it last several seconds. Moreover, numerical simulations neglecting atmospheric refraction successfully reproduce this phenomenon, which once again demonstrates that refraction doesn't play any significant role here. Jan 4, 2020 at 22:00
• @Ruslan Multiple hours? I dont hold my breath while waiting your link for that. Here is the wiki en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_hour and here some more earthsky.org/earth/what-is-the-blue-hour I am done with you. Bye. Jan 4, 2020 at 22:19
• Just see this: polar night. At the extreme, it lasts for the whole day. In the beginning of winter, until winter solstice comes, all you have is twilight of varying depth (which is, of course, also whole-day-long). Jan 4, 2020 at 22:22