3
$\begingroup$

In a well known Maxwell paper he uses the units of wavelength which he calls the Fraunhofer Measure. He states it for the Fraunhofer D and F bands as

$$\lambda_D = 2175 \text{ crazy units} = 589nm$$

$$\lambda_F = 1794 \text{ crazy units} = 486nm$$

So the conversion is:

$$1nm \approx 3.69\text{ crazy units}$$ $$1 \text{ crazy unit} \approx 0.270nm$$

But what is the motivation for this?

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think the original conversion factor in the question was wrong; I've made an edit fixing it. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 24, 2012 at 21:26
  • $\begingroup$ The "crazy unit" is probably a characteristic lattice length scale (between neighboring atoms in a lattice) for a common material, which was easy to compare diffraction experiments with. So all materials were measured relative to this "standard candle" material. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Nov 24, 2012 at 21:59
  • $\begingroup$ @Qmechanic I think the reference in my answer below clears it up; the Paris inch was probably more common in those days! $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 24, 2012 at 22:06
  • $\begingroup$ @JasonDavies oops wrong way round :) $\endgroup$
    – Lucas
    Commented Nov 24, 2012 at 23:22

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

I'm guessing this is related to the archaic Paris inch, which is $27.069$mm, i.e. $10^8 \times$ the conversion factor.

Reference: Scientific Papers Vol 2 1881-1887, John William Strutt.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ It's from exactly the same area of literature, so it makes sense. Oh, and it says K is Mrs Maxwell (J is Mr) $\endgroup$
    – Lucas
    Commented Nov 24, 2012 at 23:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.