Skip to main content
I think you made a mistake in calculating the conversion.
Source Link
Lucas
  • 481
  • 1
  • 5
  • 11

In a well known Maxwell paper he uses the units of wavelength which he calls the Fraunhofer Measure. He states it for the Fraunhofer D and F bands as

$$\lambda_D = 2175 \text{ crazy units} = 589nm$$

$$\lambda_F = 1794 \text{ crazy units} = 486nm$$

So the conversion is:

$$1\text{ crazy unit} \approx 0.270nm$$$$1nm \approx 3.69\text{ crazy units}$$ $$1 \text{ crazy unit} \approx 0.270nm$$

But what is the motivation for this?

In a well known Maxwell paper he uses the units of wavelength which he calls the Fraunhofer Measure. He states it for the Fraunhofer D and F bands as

$$\lambda_D = 2175 \text{ crazy units} = 589nm$$

$$\lambda_F = 1794 \text{ crazy units} = 486nm$$

So the conversion is:

$$1\text{ crazy unit} \approx 0.270nm$$

But what is the motivation for this?

In a well known Maxwell paper he uses the units of wavelength which he calls the Fraunhofer Measure. He states it for the Fraunhofer D and F bands as

$$\lambda_D = 2175 \text{ crazy units} = 589nm$$

$$\lambda_F = 1794 \text{ crazy units} = 486nm$$

So the conversion is:

$$1nm \approx 3.69\text{ crazy units}$$ $$1 \text{ crazy unit} \approx 0.270nm$$

But what is the motivation for this?

I think you made a mistake in calculating the conversion.
Source Link

In a well known Maxwell paper he uses the units of wavelength which he calls the Fraunhofer Measure. He states it for the Fraunhofer D and F bands as

$$\lambda_D = 2175 \text{ crazy units} = 589nm$$

$$\lambda_F = 1794 \text{ crazy units} = 486nm$$

So the conversion is:

$$1\text{ crazy unit} \approx 3.69nm$$$$1\text{ crazy unit} \approx 0.270nm$$

But what is the motivation for this?

In a well known Maxwell paper he uses the units of wavelength which he calls the Fraunhofer Measure. He states it for the Fraunhofer D and F bands as

$$\lambda_D = 2175 \text{ crazy units} = 589nm$$

$$\lambda_F = 1794 \text{ crazy units} = 486nm$$

So the conversion is:

$$1\text{ crazy unit} \approx 3.69nm$$

But what is the motivation for this?

In a well known Maxwell paper he uses the units of wavelength which he calls the Fraunhofer Measure. He states it for the Fraunhofer D and F bands as

$$\lambda_D = 2175 \text{ crazy units} = 589nm$$

$$\lambda_F = 1794 \text{ crazy units} = 486nm$$

So the conversion is:

$$1\text{ crazy unit} \approx 0.270nm$$

But what is the motivation for this?

Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/272460117696466945
deleted 2 characters in body
Source Link
Lucas
  • 481
  • 1
  • 5
  • 11

In a well known Maxwell paper he uses the units of wavelength which he calls the Fraunhofer Measure. Which he givesHe states it for the Fraunhofer D and F bands as

$$\lambda_D = 2175 \text{ crazy units} = 589nm$$

$$\lambda_F = 1794 \text{ crazy units} = 486nm$$

So the conversion is:

$$1\text{ crazy unit} \approx 3.69nm$$

But what is the motivation for this?

In a well known Maxwell paper he uses the units of wavelength which he calls the Fraunhofer Measure. Which he gives for the Fraunhofer D and F bands as

$$\lambda_D = 2175 \text{ crazy units} = 589nm$$

$$\lambda_F = 1794 \text{ crazy units} = 486nm$$

So the conversion is:

$$1\text{ crazy unit} \approx 3.69nm$$

But what is the motivation for this?

In a well known Maxwell paper he uses the units of wavelength which he calls the Fraunhofer Measure. He states it for the Fraunhofer D and F bands as

$$\lambda_D = 2175 \text{ crazy units} = 589nm$$

$$\lambda_F = 1794 \text{ crazy units} = 486nm$$

So the conversion is:

$$1\text{ crazy unit} \approx 3.69nm$$

But what is the motivation for this?

Source Link
Lucas
  • 481
  • 1
  • 5
  • 11
Loading