I was wondering how to write the density matrix of two spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ in a mixture of singlets and triplets. By definition for a mixture, $$ \hat{\rho}=\sum_{j}w_j\, |\psi_j \rangle\langle \psi_j| . $$ But it makes sense for a mixture, given the singlet $$ |0,0\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|\downarrow\uparrow\rangle - |\uparrow\downarrow\rangle) $$ that is a superposition of states, to write $|0,0 \rangle\langle 0,0|$? I think not because it will be coherence.

I was thinking also to do $$ \hat{\rho}=w_1|\uparrow\downarrow \rangle\langle \uparrow\downarrow|+w_2|\downarrow\uparrow \rangle\langle \downarrow\uparrow|+w_3|\uparrow\uparrow \rangle\langle \uparrow\uparrow|+w_4|\downarrow\downarrow \rangle\langle \downarrow\downarrow| $$

and to write it in the basis

$ \left( \begin{matrix} \uparrow\uparrow\\ \uparrow\downarrow\\ \downarrow\uparrow\\ \downarrow\downarrow \end{matrix} \right)$

But is it right?

  • $\begingroup$ Why would $|00 \rangle\langle 00|$ not make sense? I don't understand what you mean with "because it will be coherence". $\endgroup$ – Noiralef Oct 26 '17 at 17:28
  • $\begingroup$ Because in this way, at least if I understood the topic, I have non-diagonal elements and I'm looking for a mixture. Or maybe I'm in the wrong basis. $\endgroup$ – TheEinz Oct 26 '17 at 17:41
  • $\begingroup$ A mixture can absolutely have non-diagonal elements. The density matrix will only be diagonal if you consider a mixture of basis states. (Whether the density matrix is correct or not does not depend on the basis, of course.) $\endgroup$ – Noiralef Oct 26 '17 at 17:48

In principle, if $\vert \psi_i\rangle \in \{\vert\uparrow\uparrow\rangle,\vert\uparrow\downarrow\rangle,\vert\downarrow\uparrow\rangle,\vert\downarrow\downarrow\rangle\}$ then your density matrix will be a sum $$ \rho=\sum_{ij}w_{ij}\vert\psi_j\rangle\langle \psi_i\vert \, . $$ There is no a priori reason to restrict to diagonal terms. If you original Hilbert space is $4\times 4$ (as it is here) your density matrix should have $16$ elements, be hermitian, and satisfy the normalization $\sum_{i} w_{ii}=1$.

Note that it is possible to arrange your spin states so they couple to good angular momentum $j=1$ and $j=0$, i.e use the $\{\vert 1,m\rangle, \vert 00\rangle\}$ basis. In this case, $$ \rho=\sum_{jmm'}w_{jmm'}\vert jm\rangle\langle j'm'\vert \, ,\quad j,j'=\{0,1\}\, ,\quad -j\le m\le j,\quad -j'\le m'\le j', $$


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.