I am slightly confused on terminology grounds which of the following two equations is the 'Boltzmann equation': $$\newcommand{\p}[2]{\frac{\partial #1}{\partial #2}} \newcommand{\f}[2]{\frac{ #1}{ #2}} \newcommand{\l}[0]{\left(} \newcommand{\r}[0]{\right)} \newcommand{\mean}[1]{\langle #1 \rangle}\newcommand{\e}[0]{\varepsilon} \newcommand{\ket}[1]{\left|#1\right>} \newcommand{\bra}[1]{\left<#1\right|} \newcommand{\braoket}[3]{\left<#1\right|#2\left|#3\right>} \p{f_\alpha}{t}+\vec v\cdot \nabla f_\alpha+\vec a \cdot \nabla_vf_\alpha=\l \f{\delta f_\alpha}{\delta t}\r_{col}\tag{1}$$ or $$ \p{f_\alpha}{t}+\vec v\cdot \nabla f_\alpha+\vec a \cdot \nabla_vf_\alpha=\sum_\beta\int_{\vec v_1} \int_\Omega(f'_\alpha f'_{\beta_1}-f_\alpha f_{\beta_1})d^3v_1 g \sigma(\Omega) d\Omega \tag{2}$$ where expression (2) is expression (1) with the Boltzmann collision integral subbed in.
My question is therefore, which of (1) and (2) is actually the Boltzmann equation. If (1) - is it still called the Boltzmann equation if we sub in say the Krook model for the collision operator.