I am studying quantum field theory from David Tong's lecture notes and I am stuck at a particular place.

In Page 52., under the heading 3.1.1 Dyson's Formula, Tong introduces an unitary operator $U(t, t_0) = T \exp(-i\int_{t_0}^{t}H_I(t') dt')$

He then introduces the usual definition of time ordered products and goes on to expand $U(t,t_0)$. I am not able to follow how he expanded the time ordered product of operators in the second-order term of the Taylor expansion of the exponential. In particular, I am unable to follow the limits being used and why why both integrals are being put in the front. Should we not get product of two integrals involving $H_I$?

The expansion of $U(t,t_0)$ is given by

$1 - i\int_{t_0}^{t}dt'H_I(t') + \frac{-i^2}{2}[\int_{t_0}^{t}dt'\int_{t'}^{t}dt''H_I(t'')H_I(t')+\int_{t_0}^{t}dt'\int_{t_0}^{t'}dt''H_I(t')H_I(t'')]+... $

Link to Course Page - David Tong: Lectures on Quantum Field Theory


To the second order (for example), the expansion of the time evolution operator is: $$U(t,t_0) = T\exp\left(-i\int_{t_0}^tH_I(t')dt'\right)=1-i\int_{t_0}^tH_I(t_1)dt_1+\frac{(-i)^2}{2}T(\int_{t_0}^tH_I(t')dt')^2$$ You can see that the second order term could be rewritten as: $$\int_{t_0}^tH_I(t_1)dt_1\int_{t_0}^tH_I(t_2)dt_2$$ or $$\int_{t_0}^tH_I(t_2)dt_2\int_{t_0}^tH_I(t_1)dt_1$$ depending on the value of $t_1$ and $t_2$ (Remember that the interacting Hamiltonians at different times do not commute with each other). With the aid of the time-order product, we can safely write: \begin{align} \frac{(-i)^2}{2}T(\int_{t_0}^tH_I(t')dt')^2=\frac{(-i)^2}{2}T\int_{t_0}^tH_I(t_1)dt_1\int_{t_0}^tH_I(t_2)dt_2 \\ =\frac{(-i)^2}{2}T\int_{t_0}^t\int_{t_0}^tH_I(t_1)H_I(t_2)dt_1dt_2 \end{align} The expression in the end of your post can be received from this by a change of variable, which you can see in several texts.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for clearing this up. It seems very obvious right now. Expanding your last expression according to the definition of time ordered products gives us the desired expression. $\endgroup$ – noir1993 Jul 10 '17 at 18:08
  • $\begingroup$ @Lê Dũng, I still don't get how the $t'$ can be in the differential and also on the limit of the integral. Could you clarify that? $\endgroup$ – xihiro May 18 at 0:32
  • $\begingroup$ @xihiro For the integral limit, the appearance of T-product means there can be 2 cases $t_1>t_2$ and $t_2>t_1$ . This is why we have 2 integrals for the second-order term with 2 limits as in the question. For your first question, sorry I don't understand your question.Could you clarify it? $\endgroup$ – Lê Dũng Jul 9 at 14:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.