To calculate scattering amplitudes, we consider $$ A(i\to f) = \langle{f | \hat S|i} \rangle = \langle{f |\mathrm{e}^{ -\frac{i}{\hbar} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dt' H_{\mathrm{i}}(t')} |i}\rangle$$ $$ \equiv \langle{f(\infty) |\mathrm{e}^{ -\frac{i}{\hbar} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dt' H_{\mathrm{i}}(t')} |i(-\infty)}\rangle$$ where all objects are given in the interacting picture and $H_i$ denotes the normal-ordered interaction Hamiltonian in the interaction picture. (The Hamiltonian is normal-ordered to get rid of all self-loop diagrams.)

Moreover, the asymptotic in and out state are defined in terms creation operators, e.g. $$ a^\dagger(k)a^\dagger(k') |0\rangle \equiv |k,k'\rangle \equiv |i\rangle , $$ where $|0\rangle$ denotes the ground state of the free theory. (For the sake of argument, we can imagine that the experiment happens in an isolated box. We prepare the particles outside of the box, send them into the box where they interact, and afterwards observe them outside of the box again. Moreover, we isolate the two incoming (or outgoing) particles sufficiently such that we can assume that no interactions happens and we can treat them non-interacting particles. In other words, they are eigenstates of the free theory, i.e. $H_0$.)

By using these formulas it's possible to calculate cross sections without ever mentioning something like an interacting vacuum $|\Omega\rangle$. (This is done, for example, in Tong's lecture notes and the book by Lancaster and Blundell.)

On the other hand, many books emphasize that the interacting vacuum $|\Omega\rangle$ is essential and then discuss the usual ways to handle it (LSZ, Gell-Mann low).

Where exactly and how does $|\Omega\rangle$ enter the story? What goes wrong if we calculate cross sections in the "naive" approach discussed above?

PS: Tong seems to suggest on page 75 that the distinction between $|\Omega\rangle$ and $|0\rangle$ only becomes important once we consider more sophisticated questions such as how to

"compute the viscosity of the quark gluon plasma, or the optical conductivity in a tentative model of strange metals, or figure out the non-Gaussianity of density perturbations arising in the CMB from novel models of inflation."

To answer these questions we must evaluate correlation functions of the form $$\langle \Omega | \phi_H^1 \ldots \phi_H^n |\Omega\rangle$$ which involve the interacting ground state $|\Omega\rangle$ (and Heisenberg picture fields). The LSZ formula then allows us to evaluate these expressions by relating them to the scattering amplitudes we are familiar with that involve the free vacuum $|0\rangle$ (see Eq. 3.95 in Tong's notes).

However, I've never seen a standard qft textbook that treats these more complicated questions. Thus it would be strange that most textbooks emphasize the importance of the LSZ formula if it were only relevant for these advanced questions. On the other hand, the thing on the left-hand side in the LSZ formula (involving the interacting vacuum $|\Omega\rangle$ and Heisenberg fields usually comes seemingly out of nowhere.)


3 Answers 3


I suggest you to read the very first chapter of Alex Kamenev book "Non-equilibrium systems", where he briefly discusses this point.

May be I misunderstand you question but I try to answer. Consider that you calculate average of operator $A$ for interacting system. You start from free system in state $|0\rangle$ at $t=-\infty$. Then you shift the system into state $|\Omega\rangle=U(t,-\infty)|0\rangle$, which corresponds to adiabatic switching of interaction. Then, you turn the system into the initial state with help of $U(-\infty,t)$ and perform averaging. The key point is the assumption that $U(+\infty,-\infty)|0\rangle =\exp(iL)|0\rangle$, which means that you assume interaction adiabatically swithcing on and off. I try to represent it by picture.enter image description here

Finally, I have tried to answer:

  1. $|\Omega\rangle$ appears in theory when you calculate average of operator at moment $t$.
  2. $|\Omega\rangle$ appears as the evolution of state $|0\rangle$ by evolution operator $U(t,-\infty)$ from the initial time $t=-\infty$.

The interacting theory vacuum consists of all the vacuum diagrams of the theory. In other words, think of all the Feynman diagrams that you can write down that don't have any external lines.

OK, fine, but how is that useful? Well, there is a way that one can use this to generate any correlation function that one may want to calculate. Formally one would add source terms (such as $J\phi$) to the theory. The vacuum diagram would then include those in which these source term contribute. Setting the sources to zero ($J=0$) one would recover the original interacting vacuum. One can then produce the correlations (such as $\langle\phi\phi^{\dagger}\rangle$) by applying functional derivatives to the vacuum and then set the sources to zero.

Does it help?


Scattering amplitudes, which are ultimately used to compute cross sections, are written in terms of asymptotic in and out states. The overlap of these asymptotic in and out states can be written in terms of the VEV of n point functions using LSZ, where here the n point function is in terms of the fully interacting fields in the Heisenberg Picture and the vacuum is the fully interacting vacuum $|\Omega\rangle.$ Then one uses the Gell-Mann--Low theorem to evaluate the n pt GF in terms of Interaction Picture operators. This chain of logic eluded me for a long time. For more details, see my answer to On the S-Matrix and correlation functions


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.