I recently found this article, which describes how...

It just so happens that the human stride has almost exactly the right frequency to drive the natural oscillations of coffee, when the fluid is in a typically sized coffee mug.

Judging by appearance, coffee and water's fluid dynamics seem rather similar. Unfortunately,they do not site a source, but they mention that the study was done by "a pair of fluid physicists at the University of California at Santa Barbara (UCSB)".

My question is how different are the properties of water and coffee? Is this difference significant enough to cause a dramatic change in how either fluid behaves in a mug (while walking)?

EDIT: Here is the actual published article.


1 Answer 1


The article's preprint

Mayer H. C., Krechetnikov R. "Walking with coffee: why does it spill?," Phys. Rev. E 85, 046117 (2012).

is available from the UCSB site.

From a glance of the article the phenomenon is not specific only to coffee. The authors make use of the next formula:

The natural frequencies of oscillations of a frictionless, vorticity-free, and incompressible liquid in an upright cylindrical container (cup) with a free liquid surface are well known from liquid sloshing engineering:

$$\omega_{mn}^2 = \frac{g \epsilon_{mn}}{R} \tanh\left(\epsilon_{mn} \frac{H}{R} \right) \left[1 +\frac{\sigma}{\rho g} \left( \frac{\epsilon_{mn}}{R} \right)^2 \right]$$

$H$ is the liquid height, $R$ is the cup radius, $\rho$ is the liquid density, $\sigma$ is its surface tension, $g$ is thethe gravity acceleration. $\epsilon_{mn}$ are coefficients connected to Bessel functions.

The only parameter that can be significantly different between water and coffee is surface tension $\sigma$, but then the authors rule it out:

For a typical common size of a coffee cup, $R$ $3.5$ cm and $H$ $10$ cm, which is studied here, the surface tension $\sigma$ effect is negligible.

That is their calculations are applicable both to water and coffee. Their work seems to be all about biomechanics, the way human moves with unwanted frequencies.

  • $\begingroup$ Exactly the type of answer I was looking for. Thanks, _1. $\endgroup$ Aug 15, 2012 at 17:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.