Consider two cosinusoidal signals given by \begin{gather*} z_1(t) = A_1\cos\phi_1(t)\\ z_2(t) = A_2\cos\phi_2(t) \end{gather*}
with
\begin{gather*} \phi_1(t) = (\omega_1 t + \theta_1)\\\phi_2(t) = (\omega_2 t + \theta_2) \end{gather*}
where $\theta$ is the phase shift of the signal compared to some reference signal. My understanding of the concept of phase locking is that for these two signals to be phase locked, the following condition must be met: \begin{gather*} \phi_1(t) = \phi_2(t)\end{gather*}I am currently reading Brain Dynamics by Hermann Haken, and here Haken makes a distinction between phase locking and synchrony. He says that if one were to plot $\phi(t)$ against $t$ for each of these signals, then the curves formed by this plot are considered phase locked if the vertical distance between the curves is the same at all times $t$. He then states that synchrony occurs when the two curves are coincident, i.e. on top of each other.
These definitions do not make sense to me based on my understanding of phase locking. If we have $\phi_1(t) = \phi_2(t)$ which implies phase locking, then the two curves should be coincident on such a plot and therefore synchronized by Haken's definition. Just to be clear, we are speaking only of phase here, and not considering the amplitudes of the signals.
So the question is this: what, if anything, distinguishes phase locking and synchrony?