1
$\begingroup$

So, I was practising some radioactivity physics problems for a test and I got on an easy but quite tricky question :

Given the element $\rm Co^{60}_{27}$ with a half life of $t_{1/2} = 5.2 $ years and its radioactivity is equal to $A = 0.5~\mathrm{ uBq}$ Compute its mass $m$ .

After using some formulas I got to this :

$$ m = \frac{M\cdot t_{1/2}\cdot A}{\ln2} $$

The way I got to this is as follows :

$$ A = N_0 \cdot \lambda$$ $$ A = \frac{m \cdot N_a}{M} \cdot \frac{\ln2}{t_{1/2}}$$

Where :

  1. $M$ is the molar mass of $Co^{60}$
  2. $\lambda$ is the radioactivity decay constant
  3. $N_a$ is the avogadro num

My question is that whether I should convert the $t_1/2$ to seconds or just use years ? Also should I convert $A$ to $\rm Bq$ instead of $\rm uBq$ ? Or is it possible to work directly without converting the units ?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Dimensional analysis is your friend here. A Becquerel (Bq) is decays per second; working in seconds and becquerels (rather than years and µBq) is the only way your numbers are going to come out correctly.

Now a year is of course just $3.154\cdot 10^{7}$ seconds - so whether you think you are "converting" when you write $5.2 ~(3.154\cdot 10^{7}~\rm{s})$ is a matter of opinion. Same with $\rm{1~\mu Bq = 10^{-6} ~Bq}$

And the same applies to the units of mass, of course. If you use molar mass in kg, then your answer will be in kg; if you use g, the answer will be g.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.