4
$\begingroup$

I am trying to understand the derivation of Bernoulli's principle by using the conservation of energy. This is the sketch I will be referring to. I am stuck in understanding a seemingly basic step in finding the total work done by the fluid without gravitational work. The fluid is flowing to the right, the two forces that are doing work are $p_1A_1$ and $p_2A_2$, and the two works are equal to $W_1=p_1A_1s_1$ and $W_2=p_2A_2s_2$. Now this is the part I do not understand. The total work done is $$W_1-W_2=(p_1-p_2)\Delta V.$$ Why is that when both forces act in the same direction? If we are finding the difference in work done (increase in energy) wouldn't it be $$W_2-W_1=(p_2-p_1)\Delta V~?$$ However if I go this way my signs at the end don't match up with according dynamical and hydrostatical pressures.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The direction of the forces in the sketch are simply wrong if they are the forces acting ON the moving cylinder of fluid. Assuming correct the direction of the force on A1, the force on A2 must have the opposite direction. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 28, 2016 at 18:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Why is that? I can't seem to wrap my head around the fact that those forces must have opposite directions? $\endgroup$
    – bonehead
    Commented Sep 28, 2016 at 19:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You are dealing with a fluid: it can only support compressive stresses. Movements of portions of fluid are due to differences of compressive stresses. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 28, 2016 at 19:13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think it's easier if you think of conservation of momentum ($F=ma$), which also conserves energy. This answer explains why. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 29, 2016 at 14:36

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

Ideal fluids are, by definitions, continuous bodies which support only compressive stresses. It means that a portion of fluid, say, a volume with regular boundary, is such that every small area of its boundary receives a surface force (proportional to the area) from the external part of fluid, and this force is always directed towards the interior of the portion of fluid and is orthogonal to its boundary.

A portion of fluid may move only if the sum of these compressive stresses in not vanishing.

We cannot pull (ideal) fluids, we can only push them!

In your example, you are considering an approximatively cylindrical portion of fluid bounded by two lateral surfaces A1 and A2. The remaining part of the boundary is irrelevant for the computation of the work due to the stresses on this portion of fluid, since these forces are normal to the velocity of the particles of fluid.

As the forces are always compressive, the forces on the lateral surfaces must be directed along opposite directions. Since the fluid moves from the left to the right, the force on A1 must have intensity greater than the one on A2. This difference moves (pushes) the cylinder.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer. Regarding your statement about pulling water not being physically possible, I've made a recent thread about that and I haven't had a conclusive answer so if you are interested you can check it out here: goo.gl/srj0A $\endgroup$
    – bonehead
    Commented Sep 28, 2016 at 22:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Sorry the upper link is broken, this is the correct one: goo.gl/srj0AV $\endgroup$
    – bonehead
    Commented Sep 28, 2016 at 22:45
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Thank you, I will have a look. However I was not referring to the real fluids but just to the model used to derive Bernoulli theorem. I mean that quite unphysical model named "dry water" by von Neumann! $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 28, 2016 at 23:08
  • $\begingroup$ Damn god bless you, I understood bernoullis equation because of your answer $\endgroup$
    – Brian
    Commented Apr 23, 2021 at 16:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.