1
$\begingroup$

Consider the annihilation of a neutron by an anti-neutron $$ n\overline{n} \rightarrow \pi^0 \pi^0 $$ so that the initial relative angular momentum is zero. Because the spin of neutrons is $1/2$, $J_i$ can take the values $0, 1$.

Now, in pions the spin is zero, so any angular momentum in the rhs should be in the form of $L_f$, which can only take (by conservation of total momentum) the values $0$ or $1$. By some sort of symmetry on bosons wavefunctions, it can be seen that $L_f = 0$, but I don't see why this is the case. Can you shed some light into it?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

You got it almost right. The symmetry of the wavefunction describing a system made of 2 identical boson must be even by the interchange of the 2 bosons because of the Pauli principle. Interchanging the 2 bosons position introduces a factor $(-1)^l$ with $l$ the angular momentum quantum number. Thus among the 2 values allowed by the conservation of angular momentum ($l=0,1$), only $l=0$ is allowed.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ This is the point I don't see. Why does the interchange of bosons induce the $(-1)^l$ factor in the spacial part of the wavefunction? $\endgroup$
    – nabla
    Commented Jun 18, 2016 at 9:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ because the eigenfunctions of the orbital angular momentum are the spherical harmonics $Y_l^m(\theta,\phi)$. Interchanging the position of the 2 bosons is equivalent as doing $Y_l^m(\pi-\theta,\pi+\phi) = (-1)^l Y_l^m(\theta,\phi)$, and hence the extra factor $(-1)^l$. $\endgroup$
    – Paganini
    Commented Jun 18, 2016 at 15:53
  • $\begingroup$ One last "why", I promise ;) Why interchanging the position of the 2 bosons is equivalent of changing $Y_l^m \rightarrow Y_l^m(\pi-\theta, \pi + \phi)$? $\endgroup$
    – nabla
    Commented Jun 30, 2016 at 8:27
  • $\begingroup$ Consider the barycenter of the 2 bosons: Let be $\theta,\phi$, the coordinates of one of the 2 bosons with respect to the barycenter. If you swap the 2 bosons, the one which was at $\theta,\phi$ moves to $\pi-\theta, \pi+\phi$ and hence the effect on $Y_l^m$. Does that answer your question? $\endgroup$
    – Paganini
    Commented Jul 1, 2016 at 8:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.