0
$\begingroup$

enter image description here

enter image description here

I was wondering why the behavior is more "chaotic" at 0~1V when compared to 2V+ (which is when it starts to glow).

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ It's traditional, and a lot less confusing, to have the input variable (here the voltage) be the horizontal axis, and the output variable (here the current) be the vertical axis. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 1, 2015 at 4:23

2 Answers 2

0
$\begingroup$

At very low voltages (and currents) the power produced is small, so the filament doesn't produce much heat. At these low temperatures the bulb tends to have significant interactions with the surroundings, especially drafts which will cool the bulb in an unpredictable fashion.

Another source of error may be the bulb contacts, which may be showing significant resistance change with very small changes in mechanical pressure/orientation. At higher currents, these effects become less significant.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

You have two sources of error: error in the source voltage, and error in the current measurement. Since your graph is log-log, at the bottom left corner (small currents and voltages) any errors are greatly magnified; even a 50mA or 100mv error looks big. At the top right corner, however, the (probably of a similar magnitude) errors are swamped by the signal.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.