Relative velocity between a ball hitting a rod [closed]

A ball of mass $m$ travelling with a velocity $v_0$ collides elastically, and perpendicularly with a rod at a distance $d$ from the center of the rod. The rod has a mass $M$ and lies on a frictionless table. Show that the relative velocity between the ball and the hitting point doesn't change because of the collision.

The rod length is not stated in the problem.

I tried to use the 2 following equations: $$m\vec{v_0}=m\vec{u_1}+M\vec{u_2} \\ md\vec{v_0}=md\vec{u_1}+\frac{1}{12}ML^2\cdot \vec{\omega}$$ where the origin is located at the rod's center, I added a new variable $L$, the rod's length, and $\vec{u_1}$ and $\vec{u_2}$ are the ball's and C.M of the rod velocities after the collision, respectivly. I am not sure whether I can use another eq., related to elastic collisions: $$\vec{v_0}+\vec{u_1}=\vec{u_2}$$ Using the whole 3, I wouldn't manage to show that $$\vec{u_0}=\vec{\omega }d$$ (Which is the condition I need to show).

Is there anything incorrect about my reasoning?

closed as off-topic by ACuriousMind♦, Rob Jeffries, Kyle Oman, Brandon Enright, Kyle KanosJan 16 '15 at 0:57

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

• "Homework-like questions should ask about a specific physics concept and show some effort to work through the problem. We want our questions to be useful to the broader community, and to future users. See our meta site for more guidance on how to edit your question to make it better" – ACuriousMind, Rob Jeffries, Kyle Oman, Brandon Enright, Kyle Kanos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

• Yes, it seems me incorrect. When the ball hits the bar, it transmits to the bar an angular momentum $m\vec v_0d$. This angular momentum may not pass integrally to the rod, a part $m\vec ud$ may be retained by the ball (it may be even in opposite direction than $m\vec v_0d$. I presume that as a result of the collision the bar will rotate around its center. The you have – Sofia Jan 16 '15 at 1:18