15
$\begingroup$

I am the blue car in this scenario. If I am stopped on the highway and am passed by a car going fast (about 65 mph), I feel my car rock in the left/right direction. I think I understand why this happens: the wake of the red car in the air pushes my car back and forth.

stopped car being passed by fast car in opposite direction

But if I'm moving slowly forward (say 5 mph or less), I don't feel anything when the car passes. I would think that, if anything, the force would be stronger, because the velocity difference is now 70 mph. I'm moving slowly enough that the rocking would still be quite noticeable. Why don't I feel the rocking any more in this scenario?

slowly-moving car being passed by fast car in opposite direction

Update: As suggested by RedGrittyBrick, I recorded some accelerometer data from my phone to try to better understand what's happening. My phone was mounted to the dash with a mount that holds it in place; it was approximately positioned so that the x (left/right), y (up/down), and z (forward/back) coordinates match that of the car. From watching the x-axis data as it was recorded, I think his explanation is the most likely one: it is so slight that I don't notice it being so significant when moving slowly.

If you want to view the data yourself, you can see the raw data yourself. There's 17 minutes of raw data there, not all of it useful; IIRC it was towards the end, look for where the data is least noisy to find where I'm stopped; if you see a slight left-then-right on the x axis, that's me being passed. If anyone knows of a good way to view and analyze this data (or point me in the direction of what tool(s) to use to do that myself), maybe you can get a more accurate interpretation of it (and I can assist in telling you what was going on in the real-world in association with the data).

What I'd like to know specifically is: in objective terms, how strong is the rocking from when I'm moving slowly compared to when I'm stopped? There was too much vibration for me to see it real-time, but maybe it can still be extracted from the data?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I challenge your statement that you don't feel the wind force. I've felt it any number of times on relatively narrow roadways. In all likelihood you're nowhere near as close to the other car as you think you are, or you've got Led Zeppelin blasting and can't tell the difference :-) $\endgroup$ – Carl Witthoft Dec 1 '14 at 20:17
  • $\begingroup$ @Carl regarding how close, see bit.ly/1vcMWIt for a similar stretch of road; I'd say about 20 ft at most between the sides of the cars (it is quite a bit closer than your typical divided highway). I should also mention that my windows are rolled up, so I'm sure you're right that there's still a wind force, but my claim is that I don't feel my car react to the wind by rocking. $\endgroup$ – Tim S. Dec 1 '14 at 20:33
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I tend to agree with Carl on this one. I've certainly experienced this rocking sensation when passed while moving. This is a really tough question to answer without some data. If you find yourself in this situation on the side of the road a lot (if you are a police officer, for instance) perhaps you can record some video of this phenomenon to back up your claim next time you are in a situation like this. $\endgroup$ – Geoffrey Dec 1 '14 at 21:25
  • $\begingroup$ @Geoffrey Hm... I'm not in this situation too often, but I do encounter it during my commute now and then (or I could pull to the shoulder to investigate this - the directions involved would be reversed, though). I'd expect that I could get a good-enough quality video of it with my phone. I'm still fairly sure of my own memory on this, but proving it to myself as much as to everyone else would be good. =) $\endgroup$ – Tim S. Dec 1 '14 at 21:37
  • $\begingroup$ As a cyclist, I cannot confirm your observations. $\endgroup$ – pfnuesel Dec 1 '14 at 22:07
7
$\begingroup$

Related questions


Observer stationary

A vehicle passing a stationary vehicle can produce a complex pressure wave

enter image description here

From MEASUREMENT OF THE AERODYNAMIC PRESSURES PRODUCED BY PASSING TRAINS

In this you can see that the stationary vehicle is first pushed away and then sucked back towards the passing vehicle. Lastly the opposite sequence occurs at the tail end of the passing vehicle.

Observer moving

When the observer's vehicle is moving relatively slowly, I don't have an explanation for why any objectively measured forces would be much reduced.

However a slowly moving vehicle is producing a lot more shaking and vibration than a stationary one and this may mask a human observer's perception of additional motions. Our perception may be affected in a non-linear way by a base level of shaking induced by motion. Also, as a driver, I notice bumping and shaking much much less than I do as a passenger, this is perhaps due to my concentration being focussed elsewhere and my anticipation of motion induced by control inputs. If so the former might be a factor in the passing vehicle observation when the observer is actively driving.

Maybe some experimentation with phone accelerometers would produce some useful data?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I like the accelerometer idea! I took a video earlier, but I don't think it is too useful, due to my own shakiness. $\endgroup$ – Tim S. Dec 2 '14 at 22:04
  • $\begingroup$ I was going to post something like this in a couple of days if nothing happened on this question. I think this (along with the Bernoulli's Principle explanation) is the right answer. I agree that you probably just notice the rocking less when moving. Road turbulence is generally a lot greater than most people give it credit for. $\endgroup$ – Geoffrey Dec 3 '14 at 0:35
  • $\begingroup$ I've updated my question with accelerometer data and comments. I'm going to mark this as the accepted answer, because I think you're right that the shaking of a slowly-moving car is more than I realized, and that drowns out the side-to-side motion. $\endgroup$ – Tim S. Dec 5 '14 at 12:58
3
$\begingroup$

The relative speed of your car and another car does not matter since your car is affected only by air.

Probable explanation.

A moving car is producing a wind, blowing in nearly perpendicular direction

enter image description here

These streams of are are similar to rain drops. And it is a subject for Galileo transform.

If you stay and rain is vertical, it falls on your top. If you run, then the same rain will fall into the face.

The direction of rain turns from vertical to diagonal in move.

The same occurs with drops of "airmade" rain.

If you stay, it falls on the side of your car. A car is not very stable in lateral direction and it swings. When you start to move, a "rain" start to fall more from the front

enter image description here

The car is more stable in longitudinal direction and it is less affected.

UPDATE

Probably important part of the answer is a car aerodynamics. The Galileo transform affects flow velocity, but the force is changes due to aerodynamics:

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I liked this idea, however the Galileo transform does not affect the lateral component of force $\endgroup$ – lionelbrits Dec 5 '14 at 12:16
  • $\begingroup$ It doesn't affect the lateral component of the velocity, but it does affect lateral component of the force, because the force is derived from car aerodynamics (it's shape). $\endgroup$ – Dims Dec 5 '14 at 13:55
-2
$\begingroup$

Mayby the moving mass of your car makes it more stabile. The same as a giroscope. The mass of a ciclist is lower so he can experiënce more swaying. Large motorhomes and caravans also sway more when a truck passes. And those are riding at about 50 m/h. So learning while writing , its a combination of surface and streamline, and the stability the moving mass gives.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.