15
$\begingroup$

Basically, I want to know how one can see the $SL(2,\mathbb{R})\times SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ symmetry of AdS$_3$ explicitly.

AdS$_3$ can be defined as hyperboloid in $\mathbb{R}^{2,2}$ as $$ X_{-1}^2+X_0^2-X_1^2-X_2^2=L^2 $$ where $L$ is the AdS radius. Since the metric of $\mathbb{R}^{2,2}$, $$ ds^2=-dX_{-1}^2-dX_0^2+dX_1^2+dX_2^2, $$ is invariant under $SO(2,2)$ transformations and also the hyperboloid defined above is invariant we can conclude that AdS$_3$ has an $SO(2,2)$ symmetry.

One can probably show with pure group theoretical arguments that the $SO(2,2)$ symmetry is isomorphic to an $SL(2,\mathbb{R})\times SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ symmetry. I would like to know however, if one can see this symmetry more explicitly in some representation of AdS$_3$?

I suppose a starting point might be, that one can write the hyperboloid constraint equation as $$ \frac{1}{L^2}\text{det}\;\begin{pmatrix} X_{-1}-X_1 & -X_0+X_2 \\ X_0+X_2 & X_{-1}+X_1\end{pmatrix}=1 $$ i.e. there is some identification of the hyperboloid with the group manifold of $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ itself. However, that does not tell us anything about the symmetries.

The only explanation that I have found (on page 12 of Ref. 1) was that the group manifold of $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ carries the Killing-Cartan metric $$ g=\frac{1}{2}\text{tr}\,\left(g^{-1}dg\right)^2 $$ which is invariant under the actions $$ g\rightarrow k_L\, g \qquad\text{and}\qquad g\rightarrow g\, k_R $$ with $k_L,k_R\in SL(2,\mathbb{R})$. But how does one get from the metric on $\mathbb{R}^{2,2}$ to this Killing-Cartan metric? Also, I don't find this very explicit and was wondering if there is a more direct way.

References:

  1. K. Holsheimer, Surface Charges, Holographic Renormalization, and Lifshitz Spacetime, master thesis, Amsterdam. The PDF file is here.
$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Isn't $SO(2,2)$ non-compact as well. It's algebra should be isomorphic to $so(4)$, but onlike $SO(4)$ it is non-compact, or am I wrong? Anyways, the isomorphism between $SO(2,2)$ and $SL(2,\mathbb{R})\times SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ might be only on the level of the Lie algebras. In the literature, both are refered to being the isometry group of AdS$_3$, for example in the MAGOO AdS/CFT review page 150. $\endgroup$
    – physicus
    Commented Oct 27, 2014 at 0:50

1 Answer 1

14
$\begingroup$

I) First recall the fact that

$SL(2,\mathbb{R})\times SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ is (the double cover of) the identity component $SO^{+}(2,2;\mathbb{R})$ of the split orthogonal group $O(2,2;\mathbb{R})$.

This follows partly because:

  1. There is a bijective isometry from the split real space $(\mathbb{R}^{2,2},||\cdot||^2)$ to the space of $2\times2 $ real matrices $({\rm Mat}_{2\times 2}(\mathbb{R}),\det(\cdot))$, $$\mathbb{R}^{2,2} ~\ni~\tilde{x}~=~(x^0,x^1,x^2,x^3)~\mapsto~ m~=~\begin{pmatrix}x^0+x^3 & x^1 +x^2\\ x^1 -x^2 & x^0-x^3\end{pmatrix}~\in~ {\rm Mat}_{2\times 2}(\mathbb{R}) , $$ $$ ||\tilde{x}||^2 ~=~x^{\mu} \eta_{\mu\nu}x^{\nu} ~=~\det(m).$$ We use here the sign convention $(+,-,+,-)$ for the split metric $\eta_{\mu\nu}$.

  2. There is a group action $\rho: SL(2,\mathbb{R})\times SL(2,\mathbb{R})\times {\rm Mat}_{2\times 2}(\mathbb{R}) \to {\rm Mat}_{2\times 2}(\mathbb{R})$ given by $$(g_L,g_R)\quad \mapsto\quad\rho(g_L,g_R)m~:= ~g_L m g_R^t,$$ $$ g_L,g_R\in SL(2,\mathbb{R}),\qquad m\in {\rm Mat}_{2\times 2}(\mathbb{R}), $$ which is length preserving, i.e. $(g_L,g_R)$ is a split-orthogonal transformation. In other words, there is a Lie group homomorphism
    $$\rho: SL(2,\mathbb{R})\times SL(2,\mathbb{R}) \quad\to\quad O({\rm Mat}_{2\times 2}(\mathbb{R}),\mathbb{R})~\cong~ O(2,2;\mathbb{R}) , \qquad \rho(\pm {\bf 1}_{2 \times 2}, \pm {\bf 1}_{2 \times 2})~=~{\bf 1}_{{\rm Mat}_{2\times 2}(\mathbb{R})}.$$

[It is interesting to compare with similar constructions for other signatures, cf. e.g. this Phys.SE post.]

II) Next define the anti-de-Sitter space $AdS_3$ with negative cosmological constant $\Lambda<0$ as the hypersurface

$$ AdS_3 ~:=~ \det{}^{-1}(\{\Lambda^{-1}\})~:=~\{ m\in {\rm Mat}_{2\times 2}(\mathbb{R}) \mid \det(m)~=~\Lambda^{-1}\} $$

endowed with the induced metric. Note that the above group action $\rho$ preserves the anti-de-Sitter space:

$$\rho: SL(2,\mathbb{R})\times SL(2,\mathbb{R})\times AdS_3\quad \to\quad AdS_3.$$

In fact, the Lie group $SL(2,\mathbb{R})\times SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ induces in this way global isometries on $AdS_3$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ 1. Why do I need to write the transformation as $g_L m g_R^t$? Can I write it as $g_L g_R m$? 2. And how do I know that there are two $SL(2,R)$s instead of $SL(2,C)$ which can have 6 parameters? $\endgroup$
    – Nahc
    Commented Jan 23, 2017 at 19:43
  • $\begingroup$ 1. $g_L g_R m$ would not achieve more than $g_L m$. It would be redundant. 2.The question Why $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$ is different from $SL(2,\mathbb{R})\times SL(2,\mathbb{R})$? seems similar to e.g. this Phys.SE question. FWIW, topologically $SL(2,\mathbb{R})\cong S^1 \times \mathbb{R}^2$, while $SL(2,\mathbb{C})\cong S^3 \times \mathbb{R}^3$. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Jan 23, 2017 at 20:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.