8
$\begingroup$

There's this problem in Goldstein's (Classical Mechanics) derivations section:

5. Two wheels of radius $a$ are mounted on the ends of a common axle of length $b$ such that the wheels rotate independently. The whole combination rolls without slipping on a plane. Show that there are two nonholonomic equations of constraint,

$$\begin{align} \cos\theta dx + \sin\theta dy &= 0 \\ \sin\theta dx - \cos\theta dy &= \frac{1}{2}a(d\phi + d\phi'), \end{align}$$

(where $\theta$, $\phi$, and $\phi'$ have meanings similar to those in the problem of a single vertical disk, and $(x,y)$ are the coordinates of a point on the axle midway between the two wheels) and one holonomic equation of constraint,

$$\theta = C - \frac{a}{b}(\phi - \phi'),$$

where $C$ is a constant.

And here's the image from the problem with a single vertical disk:

image from problem with vertical disk

Now, I believe I have successfully derived the equations for two of those constraints, but I'll write it anyway, in case my reasoning is somehow wrong or too sloppy. (I use the labels $1$ and $2$ for the wheels, instead of unprimed and primed.)

$$\dot{x} = v \sin{\theta}$$

$$\dot{y} = -v \cos{\theta}$$ $$\implies \color{red}{\cos{\theta} \, dx + \sin{\theta} \, dy = 0}$$ And the second one: By rotating the wheels about the midpoint $(x,y)$, the angle $\theta$ changes such that $$d \theta = \frac{2}{b} \, dl$$ where $dl$ is the length of the arc swept by both wheels, satisfying $$dl = v_1 \, dt = - v_2 \, dt$$ because the wheels turn with anti-parallel velocities. $$ dl = v_1 \, dt = a \frac{d \phi_1}{dt} \, dt = a \, d\phi_1$$ $$ dl = -v_2 \, dt = -a \frac{d \phi_2}{dt} \, dt = -a \, d\phi_2$$ $$\implies \color{red}{d\theta = -\frac{a}{b} (d \phi_1 - d \phi_2) },$$ which implies the holonomic constraint equation, with flipped signs. (I guess I just picked different labels, right?)

How can I get the last one? I don't have much experience with these sorts of problems, so I was wondering, is there a systematic way to approach them or is it always just hacking at the problem, hoping to pull out the constraint equations?

P.S. My question got edited because of policy reasons according to which I cannot ask some questions, so I would like to say that I don't want to know if my reasoning is correct for the derivation of first two constraints. :)

EDIT, PLEASE READ: Although I answered my own question regarding the specific problem mentioned here, if anyone provides a good answer regarding a systematic way to derive constraint equations, I will accept that answer instead.

$\endgroup$
9
  • $\begingroup$ The first of your three questions, and to some extent the second, are off topic under our homework policy, but rather than put the question on hold I edited to cut it down to the underlying conceptual question. $\endgroup$
    – David Z
    Mar 30, 2014 at 22:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I am grateful for your mercy, my lord, for I am a mere mortal, I shall not question thee. $\endgroup$
    – user20250
    Mar 30, 2014 at 22:08
  • $\begingroup$ lol ;-) seriously though, you can edit the question further if you want. Including rolling back my edit, if you really don't like it, but I think I would put the original version of the question on hold. $\endgroup$
    – David Z
    Mar 30, 2014 at 22:10
  • $\begingroup$ Exactly, what's the point? $\endgroup$
    – user20250
    Mar 30, 2014 at 22:13
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Also, I did ask "is there a systematic way...", but I just wanted someone to confirm my reasoning for the previous derivation, I could have as well asked later in the comments, what would the difference be? You guys are seriously overly pedantic, this is counter-productive and honestly, annoying, considering the fact that my question is pretty decent compared to many other questions that pass the wrath of moderators. $\endgroup$
    – user20250
    Mar 31, 2014 at 8:58

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

Got it, I found a much better way to solve this problem, which eliminates my wish to confirm my previous reasoning and it partially answers the question the moderators' policy forced upon me, which was only a side-question to the main thing I wanted to ask, namely to help me solve this problem... That's why this answer might look like missing the point, but it isn't. Anyway, here's my answer:

The contact points of the wheels with the $xy$ plane have these coordinates for the lower (1) and the upper (2) wheel respectively:

$$(x_1,y_1) = \left(x-\frac{b}{2}\cos{\theta},\, y - \frac{b}{2}\sin{\theta}\right)$$ $$(x_2,y_2) = \left(x+\frac{b}{2}\cos{\theta},\, y + \frac{b}{2}\sin{\theta}\right)$$ Taking the time derivatives yields: $$(\dot{x_1},\dot{y_1}) = \left(\dot{x}+\frac{b}{2}\dot{\theta}\sin{\theta}, \, y - \frac{b}{2}\dot{\theta}\cos{\theta}\right)$$ $$(\dot{x_2},\dot{y_2}) = \left(\dot{x}-\frac{b}{2}\dot{\theta}\sin{\theta}, \, y + \frac{b}{2}\dot{\theta}\cos{\theta}\right)$$ Also, we have these relations: $$(\dot{x_1},\dot{y_1}) = (v_1 \sin{\theta}, -v_1 \cos{\theta}) = (a \dot{\phi_1} \sin{\theta}, -a \dot{\phi_1} \cos{\theta})$$ $$(\dot{x_2},\dot{y_2}) = (v_2 \sin{\theta}, -v_2 \cos{\theta}) = (a \dot{\phi_2} \sin{\theta}, -a \dot{\phi_2} \cos{\theta})$$ From there, eliminating $dt$ and performing simple algebraic manipulations gives: $$dx = \sin{\theta}\left(-\frac{b}{2} d\theta + a \, d\phi_1\right)$$ $$dx = \sin{\theta}\left(\frac{b}{2} d\theta + a \, d\phi_2\right)$$ $$dy = -\cos{\theta}\left(-\frac{b}{2} d\theta + a \, d\phi_1\right)$$ $$dy = -\cos{\theta}\left(\frac{b}{2} d\theta + a \, d\phi_2\right)$$ Getting the final three equations of constraint is simply a matter of combining these, but if anyone wants it, I can write out the procedure explicitly.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Welcome to the world of kinematics. Here you parametrize a position coordinate and take derivatives to get to velocity and accelration relationships. $\endgroup$ Apr 1, 2014 at 16:33
  • $\begingroup$ yeah, sometimes it's easy to miss the most obvious method xD $\endgroup$
    – user20250
    Apr 1, 2014 at 21:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.