The diagram on the left is in the xy-plane and you can liken it to a contour map taken at an instant of time, like a photograph.
Initially let me assume that the incoming light is plane polarised in y-direction.
The black lines show positions where the crests (maximum field in the y-direction) of the electric vectors of the electromagnetic waves occur.
However those black lines could equally well represent the crests of the light which was polarised in the z-direction or any other direction in the yz-plane.
What I am trying to explain is that to get an interference pattern the incoming light does not have to be plane polarised and your diagram or a ripple tank demonstration may give the opposite impression.
The diagram on the extreme right shows what the fringe pattern might look like in the yz-plane with the pattern in the z-dimension being there because you have stipulated that slits are being used, ie the interference pattern is three dimensional.
There is evidence that when Young did his experiments he used two holes and it that case the fringes generated in a yz-plane are hyperbolic as explained in the post Why is the shape of the fringes in Young's double slit experiment hyperbolic?.
As to what happens when the plane of polarisation of the light entering each of the slits differ I refer you to I polarize the slits (one H, the other V) of a Young's double-slit. If my source is H or V, do I see fringes? What about if my source is D or AD?.