i'm a highschool physics student trying to understand diffraction and interference etc.

I'm confused about this (in the context of the double slit experiment): if an underlying interference pattern occurs, e.g there are alternating maxima and minima all with the same intensity, how come when the single slit modulating envelope is applied and the interference pattern is subsequently shaped to the envelope, the intensity of subsidiary maxima in the double slit experiment decrease? e.g the bright dots that we see with our eyes fade as you go further out from the principle maxima. Additionally, in the attached image, are the maxima that are under the main part of the single slit envelope seen distinctly or do they blur together to give the bright central maxima that the double slit experiment produces.

Forgive my writing, it's just horribly difficult to express this question.

-Thank you

Attached image of the pattern

  • $\begingroup$ If the light slits were instead replaced by point light sources (2 source interference), then you will see no diffraction envelope, and the maxima will all be the same intensity. If we get rid of one of the slits and instead focus on only a single slit, you will see the diffraction envelope, the dotted line in the diagram. Can you please clarify your question a bit? $\endgroup$ – DanDan0101 Aug 27 '19 at 2:36

I think confusing arises from your diagram. The two plots are not to scale.

The single slit diffraction pattern is the smooth envelope shown (dashed line). The intensity is unmodulated.

When you add the second slit, the interference pattern appears (as a modulation of the waveform within the envelope). That is the solid line.

But: the envelope has to get "bigger", and by bigger I do NOT mean wider, rather, it needs to have more intensity (duh: there is more light).

By how much? Well, energy is conserved, so the total area under the curve has to double (there are two slits, after all).

Since the average of $sin^2(x)$ over a cycle is $\frac 1 2$, and there is twice as much light, you could guess the peak intensity needs to be 4 times brighter, and you would be correct.

The reason for this is that interference occurs because we add wave amplitudes, and when they are in-phase (out-of-phase), constructive (destructive) interference occurs. Constructive interference adds 2 amplitudes, $A$, and:

$$ A_{con} = A + A = 2A$$

and the intensity is the square of the amplitude:

$$ I_{con} = A_{con}^2 = 4A^2 = 4I $$

where $I$ is the single slit maximum.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.