2
$\begingroup$

Suppose we have a lagrangian $\mathcal{L}$ made by different fields, i.e. \begin{equation} \mathcal{L}= \mathcal{L_0} + g\phi\partial_\mu\phi A^\mu, \end{equation} where $\mathcal{L_0}$ is the free lagrangian for the fields $A^\mu$ and $\phi$.

Why is the 2-point correlation function $$\langle\Omega|T(\phi A^\mu)|\Omega\rangle = 0~?$$ In my lecture notes, my professor just assume this. Is it true in general for all types of contractions between different fields? Why? I get the intuitive explanation: if in the free lagrangian there are no terms like $\phi A^\mu$ we cannot turn a $\phi$ particle into an $A^\mu$ particle, but how can I see this more rigorously?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Your action has a $\phi \to - \phi$ symmetry so your correlators must satisfy the same thing. It follows that your correlator vanishes. $\endgroup$
    – Prahar
    Commented Dec 1, 2023 at 10:36

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

The story for a (connected) 2-point function of 2 different fields is very similar to what goes on for a 1-point function, cf. e.g. this & this related Phys.SE posts:

  1. Either a symmetry ensures that the 2-point function vanishes automatically (this is what happens in OP's example, cf. the above comment by Prahar),

  2. Or we add a quadratic interaction counterterm proportional to the 2 fields in the action in such a way that the 2-point function vanishes, i.e. the vanishing of the 2-point function is imposed as a renormalization condition.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.