1
$\begingroup$

I want to compute, using the generating functional method, the 4-point correlation function $G^{(4)}(x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4)$ for the Lagrangian

$$ \mathcal{L} [\phi, \psi, \chi] = \overline{\chi} ( i \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu - m_\chi) \chi + \overline{\psi} (i \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu - m_\psi) \psi - g \overline{\chi} \chi \phi - g \overline{\psi} \psi \phi + \frac{1}{2} \partial_\mu \phi \partial^\mu \phi - \frac{1}{2} \mu^2 \phi^2 + ... \tag{1} $$

considering a scattering$^1$ $\phi \psi \rightarrow \phi \psi$. So far, I've just tried to glue together the results that my professor derived in his lecture notes for the generating functionals for the scalar field $\phi$ and the fermionic field $\psi$, they are

$$ Z[J] = N \int \mathcal{D} \phi e^{i \int d^4x \left\{ \mathcal{L}_0[\phi] + \mathcal{L}_i[\phi] + J(x) \phi(x) \right\}} $$

and

$$ Z[\eta, \overline{\eta}] = \int \mathcal{D} \psi \int \mathcal{D} \overline{\psi} e^{i \int d^4x \left\{ \overline{\psi} (i \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu - m) \psi + \overline{\eta} (x) \psi (x) + \overline{\psi}(x) \eta(x)\right\}}.$$

So that, by combining then, I've got:

$$ Z[J,\overline{\eta}, \eta] = N \int \mathcal{D} \phi \int \mathcal{D} \psi \int \mathcal{D} \overline{\psi} e^{i \int d^4x \left\{\mathcal{L}_0[\phi, \psi]' + j(x) \phi(x) + \overline{\eta}(x) \psi(x) + \overline{\psi} (x) \eta(x) - g \overline{\psi} (x) \psi (x) \phi (x) \right\}} $$

Where $$\mathcal{L}_0[\phi, \psi] := \mathcal{L}_0 [\phi ] + \overline{\psi} (i \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu - m) \psi = \frac{1}{2} \left[ \partial_\mu \phi \partial^\mu \phi - \mu^2 \phi^2 \right] + \overline{\psi} (i \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu - m) \psi.$$ Then, noting that the 4-point correlation function is define as

$$ G^{(4)}(x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4) \doteq \frac{(-i)^4}{Z[0,0,0]} \frac{\delta^4}{\delta J(x_1) \delta \eta(x_2) \delta J(x_3) \delta \overline{\eta} (x_4)} Z[J, \eta, \overline{\eta}] \bigg|_{J, \eta, \overline{\eta} = 0}.$$

I've got, by computing the functional derivatives, that:

$$\boxed{G^{(4)}(x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4) = \frac{(-i)^4}{Z[0,0,0]} Z_0[J, \eta, \overline{\eta}] e^{-i \int d^4x g \overline{\psi} (x) \psi (x) \phi (x)} \phi(x_1) \overline{\psi} (x_2) \phi(x_3) \psi(x_4)}.$$

And then my confusion starts:

  1. Do the order of the derivatives matters? I mean, I've computed them in the following order: $$ \frac{\delta^4}{\delta J(x_1) \delta \eta(x_2) \delta J(x_3) \delta \overline{\eta} (x_4) } Z[J, \eta, \overline{\eta}]$$ But I don't know if they are the correct order or even if they are the correct derivatives (e.g. if the $x_i$ arguments are right).

  2. The ellipsis/dots in the Lagrangian (1) corresponds to terms involving the real scalar field $\phi$. Should I need to take that into account?

  3. This is a scattering that, in total, has two fields $\phi$ and two $\psi$, but in my correlation function a $\overline{\psi}$ appears. Do this make sense? And, if so, why?

I'm still a bit confused in using this formalism in anything that goes beyond a simple scalar field interacting with itself, like a $\phi^4$ theory, and with zero confidence in my calculations. Any help would be appreciated!

$^1$I've read in this same site that this also known as a "Meson-Nucleon Scattering", although my professor didn't mentioned this name even once)

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$
  1. Order of Grassmann-odd fields (and their derivatives) matters since they anticommute rather than commute.

  2. Yes, correlation functions depend on interaction terms. They are often treated perturbatively.

  3. The field $\overline{\psi}=\psi^{\ast}\gamma^0$ is not an independent field, but can often be treated as such, cf. e.g. this Phys.SE post.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.