In his Harvard lectures on QFT, Sidney Coleman defines the $S$-matrix as,
$$ S \equiv U_{I}(\infty, -\infty) $$
Where $U_{I}(-\infty, \infty)$ is the time evolution operator in the interaction picture. The $S$-matrix, according to the text, is evaluated between states in the free theory evaluated at $t = 0$ ($0$ being a matter of convention). This seems perfectly reasonable to me given that he defines the $S$-matrix as a connection between the transition probabilities in the interacting theory and the free theory, $$ \langle \phi(0)|S|\psi(0)\rangle \ = \ ^{out}\langle\Phi|\Psi\rangle^{in} \equiv \text{Transition probability in interacting theory}$$ Where the states on the left side are the ones in the free theory and the ones on the right are in the complete (or interacting) theory.
Peskin's text, on the other hand, says,
We can now relate the probability of scattering in a real experiment to an idealized set of transition amplitudes between the asymptotically defined in and out states of definite momentum, $$ _{out}\langle \textbf{p}_{1}\textbf{p}_{2}...|\textbf{k}_{A}\textbf{k}_{B}\rangle_{in} = \lim_{T\rightarrow \infty} \langle \underbrace{\textbf{p}_{1}\textbf{p}_{2}...}_{T}|\underbrace{\textbf{k}_{A}\textbf{k}_{B}}_{-T}\rangle = \lim_{T\rightarrow \infty} \langle \textbf{p}_{1}\textbf{p}_{2}...|e^{-2iHT}|\textbf{k}_{A}\textbf{k}_{B}\rangle \Rightarrow S \equiv e^{-2iHT}$$
I am confused about the kets here. The paragraph quoted above seems to the say that the states on the extreme left are idealized and asymptotically defined - which means they are the free theory states.
My question is this: I think Coleman is saying that we use the asymptotic states (defined in the free theory) with the $S$-matrix to evaluate the probabilities in the interacting theory - we already know the free theory states and we can evaluate the matrix as well, so instead of looking at what the states in the complete theory are, we calculate the overlap by exploiting the connections in the far past and far future through the $S$-matrix. Is my understanding correct?
And, if it is, why is Peskin calculating what seems to be a free theory overlap and evaluating the $S$-matrix between the interacting theory states, as the quoted paragraph seems to imply?