I’ve encountered the following arguments multiple times in notes and textbooks:
$$ \lim_{t\to -\infty} || U(t)^\dagger U_0(t) |\phi_{\text{in}}(0)\rangle - |\Psi(0)\rangle || = 0 \implies |\Psi(0)\rangle = \Omega_+ |\phi_{\text{in}}(0)\rangle $$
$$ \lim_{t\to \infty} || U(t)^\dagger U_0(t) |\phi_{\text{out}}(0)\rangle - |\Psi(0)\rangle || = 0 \implies |\Psi(0)\rangle = \Omega_- |\phi_{\text{out}}(0)\rangle $$
Here:
- $U(t)$ is the time evolution operator for the full interacting system.
- $U_0(t)$ is the time evolution operator for the free (non-interacting) system.
- $|\phi_{\text{in}}(0)\rangle$ is the "in" state at $t = 0$, representing the initial state of a particle in the free theory.
- $|\Psi(0)\rangle$ is the interacting state at $t = 0$, representing the actual state of the system.
- $\Omega_-$ is the Møller operator.
While I agree with this reasoning, there is something puzzling when computing the transition rate:
$$ \langle \phi_{\text{out}} | \Omega_-^\dagger \Omega_+ | \phi_{\text{in}} \rangle $$
From the above arguments, this expression should be equivalent to:
$$ \langle \Psi(0) | \Psi(0) \rangle $$
However, shouldn’t that always equal unity due to normalization ($\langle \Psi | \Psi \rangle = 1$)? This seems contradictory when interpreting it as a transition rate. How does one resolve this?