5
$\begingroup$

I am trying to compute the (anomalous) transformation law of the free fermion stress-tensor, not with the usual CFT arguments, but by explicit computation.

We can define the classical stress tensor $$T=i\psi^{\dagger}\partial\psi.\tag{1}$$ The quantum counterpart will be divergent, we regularize by point-splitting. The vacuum expectation value is then determined by the correlator

$$\langle T(x,x') \rangle=i \langle \psi^{\dagger}(x)\partial_{x'}\psi(x')\rangle=i\partial_{x'}\langle \psi^{\dagger}(x)\psi(x')\rangle=-\frac{1}{2\pi}\frac{1}{(x-x')^2}\tag{2}$$

where I have used $$\langle \psi(x)\psi^{\dagger}(x')\rangle=\frac{1}{2 \pi i}\frac{1}{x-x'}.\tag{3}$$

Now we define the normal ordered stress tensor by subtracting the divergence

$$:T(x):=\lim_{x' \to x} \frac{i}{2}\left(\psi^{\dagger}(x)\partial_{x'}\psi(x')-\partial_{x}\psi^{\dagger}(x)\psi(x') \right)+\frac{1}{2\pi}\frac{1}{(x-x')^2}.\tag{4}$$

In a different coordinate system, $x \to y(x)$, we do the same,

$$:T(y):=\lim_{y' \to y} \frac{i}{2}\left(\psi^{\dagger}(y)\partial_{y'}\psi(y')-\partial_{y}\psi^{\dagger}(y)\psi(y') \right)+\frac{1}{2\pi}\frac{1}{(y-y')^2}$$

From the transformation law of the fermion, $\psi(y)=\left(\frac{dx}{dy}\right)^{1/2}\psi(x)$, I should be able to deduce now that

$$:T(y):=\left(\frac{dx}{dy}\right)^2 :T(x): - \frac{c}{24 \pi} \{x,y\}.$$

with $c=1/2$ for the free fermion. Rewriting gives

$$i \psi^{\dagger}(y)\partial_{y'}\psi(y')=i\left(\frac{dx}{dy}\right)^{1/2}\left(\frac{dx'}{dy'}\right)^{3/2}\psi^{\dagger}(x)\partial_{x'}\psi(x') $$

such that

$$:T(y):= \left(\frac{dx}{dy}\right)^2 :T(x):+ \frac {1}{2 \pi}\lim_{y' \to y} \left( -\frac{1}{2}\frac{\left(\frac{dx}{dy}\right)^{1/2}\left(\frac{dx}{dy'}\right)^{3/2}+\left(\frac{dx}{dy}\right)^{3/2}\left(\frac{dx}{dy'}\right)^{1/2}}{(x(y)-x(y'))^2}+\frac{1}{(y-y')^2}\right)$$

Now when I perform the expansion with mathematica, I get almost the desired result. The right bracket becomes

$$-\frac{1}{24 \pi} \left(\frac{2 x'''(y)}{x'(y)}-\frac{3}{2}\left( \frac{x''(y)}{x'(y)}\right)^2 \right)$$

The 2 in the first term should not be there...

I made a few edits: Following Qmechanics comment, I symmetrized the stress tensor. Now I almost get the correct result, but not quite. Can't figure out where the mistake is.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Concerning conventions, are you following a reference? Which page? $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Apr 29, 2023 at 6:35
  • $\begingroup$ Comment to the post (v5): It seems eq. (2) has opposite sign convention than eq. (3). $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Apr 29, 2023 at 8:26

1 Answer 1

2
+50
$\begingroup$
  1. The central charge $c$ of a free fermion is most easily seen from the coefficient of 4th-order pole in the corresponding $TT$ OPE, cf. e.g. eq. (5.121) in Ref. 1.

  2. The central charge $c$ can also be seen as the coefficient in front of the Schwarzian derivative under a coordinate transformation of $T$ as OP wants to do, cf. eq. (5.124) in Ref. 1.

  3. Short of doing the fermionic calculation via point-splitting regularization and Taylor expansion, let us just mention that one should in principle mimic the bosonic calculation (5.136) in Ref. 1.

  4. It might be simpler to work with a symmetrized SEM tensor $$T ~\propto~ \frac{1}{2}: \psi^{\dagger}\stackrel{\leftrightarrow}{\partial}\psi:$$ where $\stackrel{\leftrightarrow}{\partial}\equiv\stackrel{\leftarrow}{\partial}\!-\!\stackrel{\rightarrow}{\partial}.$

  5. Also, don't forget that a derivative/descendant of a primary field is not a primary field, despite having a conformal weight/dimension.

References:

  1. P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu and D. Senechal, CFT, 1997; section 5.4.
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.