3
$\begingroup$

In the stress-energy tensor (SET) for free scalar and vector fields, any references to the connection $\Gamma^\lambda_{\mu\nu}$ in the kinetic terms appear to either be absent ($\nabla_\mu \phi = \partial_\mu \phi$) or cancel each other out ($F_{\mu\nu} = \nabla_\mu A_\nu - \nabla_\nu A_\mu = \partial_\mu A_\nu - \partial_\nu A_\mu$). This makes sense to me in that one shouldn't need to know the derivatives of the metric/vielbein in order to compute the source of Einstein's field equations (EFE) at a point. Starting with the symmetrized Lagrangian for a Dirac field,

$$\mathcal L = \frac{i}{2}\bar\psi \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu \psi - \frac i2 \bar\psi \overset{\leftarrow}\partial_\mu \gamma^\mu \psi - m \bar\psi\psi,$$

and promoting partial derivatives to covariant derivatives, I get the following form for the SET:

$$ T^{\mu\nu}_{\text{Dirac}} = \frac{i}{2} \bar\psi ( \gamma^\mu \overset\rightarrow\nabla^\nu + \gamma^\nu \overset\rightarrow\nabla^\mu ) \psi - \frac{i}{2} \bar\psi ( \overset\leftarrow\nabla^\nu \gamma^\mu + \overset\leftarrow\nabla^\mu \gamma^\nu ) \psi - g^{\mu\nu} \mathcal L_{\text{Dirac}} $$

In this expression for the SET of a free Dirac field, I can't seem to get the spin connection terms ($\nabla_\mu \psi - \partial_\mu \psi$) in the covariant derivatives to cancel out, so this tensor depends explicitly on the derivatives of the vielbein $e^a_\mu$. Do those spin connection terms in fact cancel each other out and reduce covariant derivatives to ordinary partial derivatives?

If not, is this not a problem when plugging into Einstein’s field equations? Since Dirac fields also obey the Klein-Gordon equation, can we write down a Klein-Gordon-like Lagrangian (throwing away information about spin) and use that to compute a connection-independent SET?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Even if curvature is "absent" in the stress tensor for a Maxwell field and a scalar, I would say it is still there implicitly in the system of equations. The equations of motion for a scalar and the Maxwell field do know about curvature. Thus the on-shell values for the Maxwell field and the scalar will reflect the presence of curvature in the way they source Einstein's equations. $\endgroup$ – user2309840 Jul 18 '16 at 3:26
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! I agree (I think) – curvature does influence the evolution of the stress tensor and equations of motion implicitly. My question is limited to computing the stress tensor and curvature on a time slice in terms of (a) the local field values and their partial derivatives only vs. (b) needing to include covariant derivatives to account for curvature. $\endgroup$ – rossng Jul 18 '16 at 4:00
3
$\begingroup$

As is wellknown, the EFE is a PDE for the metric $g_{\mu\nu}$ / vielbein $e^a{}_{\mu}$, which plays the role of the dynamical fields of GR.

OP is apparently pondering the following question.

Is the EFE's source term (i.e. the matter SEM tensor $T^{\mu\nu}$) independent of the GR fields (i.e. the metric $g_{\mu\nu}$ / vielbein $e^a{}_{\mu}$) and derivatives thereof?

Answer: No, this needs not be the case.

Examples:

  • OP is considering matter composed of Dirac fermions. The vielbein generalization of the Hilbert SEM tensor does depend on the spin connection, cf. my Phys.SE answer here.

  • Already the Maxwell SEM tensor in curved space depends on the metric $g_{\mu\nu}$.

  • A similar situation takes place in scalar QED. Here the EFEs are replaced with Maxwell's equations. The dynamical fields are now $A_{\mu}$. One may show that the source term (the electric $4$-current $j^{\mu}$) in this case depends on $A_{\mu}$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.