2
$\begingroup$

On Peskin & Schroder QFT book page 187, at eq.(6.34): $$ i \mathcal{M}=-i e F_{1}(0) \tilde{\phi}(\mathbf{q}) \cdot 2 m \xi^{\prime \dagger} \xi \tag{6.34} $$ which gives the amplitude for electron scattering from an electric field with the approximation $\bf{q}\rightarrow 0$.

What really puzzle me is that the book says the Born approximation for scattering from a potential in following equation: $$ V(\mathbf{x})=e F_{1}(0) \phi(\mathbf{x}) $$ So why do we specify this term as the potential in Born approximation?

The book says $F_{1}(0)$ is the electric charge of the electron, in unit $e$. I can understand this by the electric potential definition, however, in the leading order, $F_{1}(0)=1$, (maybe not in unit of $e$), how to understand this?

If you have any comment to this, I am really appreciate it.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Have you read Ch 6.6.1, eqn 6.9, in your text? Or this or this? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 22, 2022 at 14:41
  • $\begingroup$ @CosmasZachos thank you professor, I will check it! $\endgroup$
    – Daren
    Commented Jul 22, 2022 at 15:01
  • $\begingroup$ sorry professor, I do not get it as ch 6.1 or eqn 6.9 is about classical treatment of an electron emitting an em wave.. do you mean I can dervive Born approximation from ch6.1? $\endgroup$
    – Li Chiyan
    Commented Nov 14, 2022 at 23:49
  • $\begingroup$ @LiChiyan If you want to connect with the professor CosmasZachos, you need to @ him in comment! Let's me also re-think my post! $\endgroup$
    – Daren
    Commented Nov 15, 2022 at 13:44

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

I am self-studying QFT, I may not get the right answer, I just wonder if I get it correctly.

We consider some potential $V$ as a perturbation, in QM $H=H_o +V$, in QFT we consider $V$ as $H_{int}$.

In QM, first term in the first Born approximation tells us

$\langle p'|M|p \rangle \approx \langle p'|V|p \rangle =\int d^3rV(r)e^{-iqr}={V}(q)$

If we consider $\langle p'|M|p \rangle$ in QM acts like $\langle p'|M|p \rangle$ in QFT, we can write

$\langle p'|iT|p \rangle= -iV(q)(2\pi)^4\delta^4(p-p'-q)$,

and here if we consider classical potential $V(x)=e\phi(x), V(q)=e\phi(q)$, we have

from Born approximation $\langle p'|iT|p\rangle=-ie\phi(q) (2\pi)^4\delta^4(p-p'-q)$

from QFT $\langle p'|iT|p\rangle=iM (2\pi)^4\delta^4(p-p'-q) =-ieF_1(0)\phi(q)(2\pi)^4\delta^4(p-p'-q) 2m \xi'^\dagger \xi$

When we compare terms, $2m$ is dropped due to different normalization in QFT and QM, $\xi'^\dagger \xi$ is irrelavant as it just tells us polarization is conserved. So, we have $F_1(0)=1$

I really doubt I am correct, please comment.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.