0
$\begingroup$

In Tong's QFT notes at the bottom of page 14, it is claimed that if a change $x\mapsto x-\epsilon$ is made, the Lagrangian changes in the following way:

$$\mathcal L(x)\rightarrow \mathcal L(x)+\epsilon^\nu \partial_\nu\mathcal L(x). \tag{1.40}$$

This of course comes from the Taylor expansion, what isn't clear to me is what $\mathcal L$ should be an explicit function of $x$? $\mathcal L$ is usually define to be $\mathcal L(\phi(x),\partial_\mu\phi(x),...)$, it's not clear to me why this can be straightforwardly Taylor expanded.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

You can use the chain rule to handle any implicit dependence on $x$,

\begin{equation} \partial_\mu \mathcal{L}\left(\phi(x), \partial_\nu \phi(x)\right) = \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \phi} \partial_\mu \phi + \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \partial_\nu \phi} \partial_\mu \partial_\nu \phi. \end{equation}

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ So if we have a function which implicitly depends on a variable, say $f(g(x))$, the Taylor series of $f$ in $x$ is done in the exact same way? $\endgroup$
    – Charlie
    Commented May 30, 2022 at 20:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Charlie Yes. Since $$ g(x + \epsilon) = g(x) + g'(x) \epsilon $$ Then $$ f(g(x+\epsilon)) = f(g(x) + g'(x) \epsilon) = f(g(x)) + f'(g(x)) g'(x) \epsilon $$ The second term on the RHS above is the chain rule (multiplied by $\epsilon$). $\endgroup$
    – Andrew
    Commented May 30, 2022 at 20:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.