8
$\begingroup$

As far as I understand, Noether's theorem for fields works, as explained in David Tong's QFT lecture notes (page 14) for example, by saying that a transformation $\phi(x) \mapsto \phi(x) + \delta \phi (x)$ is called a symmetry if it produces a change in the Lagrangian density which can be expressed as a four divergence, $$\delta \mathcal{L} = \partial_{\mu} F^{\mu}\tag{1.35} $$ for some 4-vector field $F^{\mu}$.

We thengo onto show that the change in this Lagrangian density may also be expressed for an arbitrary transformation as

$$\delta \mathcal{L} = \partial_{\mu}\bigg(\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial(\partial_{\mu} \phi)}\delta \phi\bigg)\tag{1.37}.$$

Which is a 4-divergence. So how could we say any transformation is not a symmetry in the sense above?

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

12
$\begingroup$

The point is that eq. (1.35) should hold off-shell to have a symmetry, while eq. (1.37) may only hold on-shell.

[The term on-shell (in this context) means that the Euler-Lagrange equations are satisfied. See also this Phys.SE post.]

In other words: On-shell, the action will only change with at most a boundary term for any infinitesimal variation, whether or not it is a symmetry.

Phrased differently: By a symmetry is meant an off-shell symmetry. An on-shell symmetry is a vacuous notion.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Oh yeah, of course! And eq. (1.35) should be off-shell so that the action is still a minimum (as the nearby trajectories of the new trajectory will have their action changed by the same amount each) $\endgroup$
    – guillefix
    Commented Oct 11, 2014 at 23:16
  • $\begingroup$ On another note, even if $\delta \mathcal{L}$ doesn't have an off-shell 4-divergence form, can it , for example, happen to still equal zero in the on-shell trajectory and thus give a conserved 4-current density, even though our transformation wasn't a symmetry? $\endgroup$
    – guillefix
    Commented Oct 12, 2014 at 12:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.