2
$\begingroup$

I'm reading a section about correlation amplitudes in Sakurai. We are considering the correlation amplitude $C(t)$ of state $|\alpha \rangle$ which is in a superposition of energy eigenstates $\{|a'\rangle\}$ $$C(t) = \sum_{a^{\prime}}\left|c_{a^{\prime}}\right|^{2} \exp \left(\frac{-i E_{a^{\prime}} t}{\hbar}\right).$$

I don't understand the following statement by the author:

As we sum over many terms with oscillating time dependence of different frequencies, a strong cancellation is possible for moderately large values of $t$. We expect the correlation amplitude that starts with unity at $t=0$ to decrease in magnitude with time.

My intuition is the following. We see from the correlation amplitude that each contributing term has a complex phase that changes with time but at a different frequency. When enough time has passed, because the phases change with a different frequency, each term will essentially have a random orientation. As a consequence, if there are many energy eigenstates, and therefore many terms in $C(t)$, each contribution coming from them will tend to cancel with another contribution with the opposite orientation. Crucially, this argument seems to only work in the limit $t,\text{number of energy eigenvalues} \to \infty$.

I would really apreciate if someone told me whether my intution is correct and maybe show me a more rigorous version of my arguments.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Yes, your intuition is basically right.

It's useful to look at a few examples.

First, for a finite number of eigenstates in the sum, $C(t)$ will inevitably be periodic. Nevertheless, one still generically expects $C(t)$ to decrease from $1$ to some small value, before being "dragged back" to $1$ by the requirement that $C(t)$ be periodic. As an example, we can consider the situation $E_a = a \hbar \omega$, with the sum going from $a=0$ to $a=N-1$, and $c_a=1/N$ for all $a$. Then we have \begin{equation} C(t) = \sum_{a=0}^{N-1} \frac{e^{i a \omega t}}{N} = \frac{1}{N} \frac{1 - e^{i N \omega t}}{1-e^{i \omega t}} = \frac{e^{i (N-1) \omega t /2}}{N} \frac{\sin\left(\frac{N\omega t}{2}\right)}{\sin\left(\frac{\omega t}{2}\right)} \end{equation} First, note that in the limit $t\rightarrow 0$, $C(t)$ goes to $1$, as expected. Additionally, $C(t)$ is periodic with period $2\pi/\omega$, which is the period of the slowest (non-constant) mode. (You might think the right hand side is periodic with period $4\pi/\omega$ based on the sine wave in the denominator, but note that when $t=2\pi/\omega$ the numerator and denominator are both $-1$ for any $N$, and so the final result is $+1$; this agrees with the translational symmetry that is obvious in the mode expansion for $C(t)$).

Nevertheless, there are places where $C(t)$ vanishes. If we just consider the amplitude $|C(t)| \propto \left|\frac{\sin(N \omega t/2)}{\sin(\omega t/2)}\right|$, then the amplitude will be largest when the numerator and denominator are both small and have approximately the same size (near $t \approx 0, 2\pi/\omega, 4\pi/\omega, ...$), and smallest when the denominator is "large" (the most extreme cases being $t\approx \pi/\omega, 3\pi/\omega, ... $. Here is a plot showing the behavior of $|C(t)|$ for $N=\{3,10,100\}$

enter image description here

There are also a few interesting limiting cases to consider.

  • In the limit $N\rightarrow \infty$, the sum will become a Dirac comb with spacing $2\pi/\omega$. This is a extreme case where $|C(t)|$ is only non-zero when $t=0$, then immediately decoheres to zero, before being "forced back" by periodicity and repeating the cycle.

  • If you take the continuum limit so $a$ is a continuous variable and not a discrete index over a finite range of frequencies from $\omega=0$ to $\omega=\Omega$ (this amounts to sending $\omega\rightarrow 0$ but sending $N\rightarrow \infty$ in such a way that we keep the maximum frequency $\Omega=N\omega$ finite), then you will find that $|C(t)|$ is given by a sinc function. In other words, $|C(t)|=1$ for $t=0$, and then falls off to zero over some time scale given by one divided by the bandwidth, $\sim 1/\Omega$.

  • If you then take the limit $\Omega\rightarrow \infty$, then $|C(t)|$ will simply be a delta function at $t=0$. It will be non-zero exactly when $t=0$, then decohere immediately and never be zero again.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.