3
$\begingroup$

What does the $\Delta p$ in uncertainty principle mean? Is it standard deviation?

I have seen few videos on youtube as well as in our high school textbooks, it was proved that the electrons don't exist in nucleus using this principle. The thing which is confusing me is that they considered $\Delta p$ as the exact momentum. Some of them even tried to explain that this $\Delta p$ is simply the momentum of the electron and the inequality sign which is present in the equation is the one which is ensuring uncertainty. But the used the value of diametre of nucleus (probable diametre) as $\Delta x$. Now this thing isn't making any sense. Because when considering $\Delta p$ they considered it to be the momentum whereas the considered $\Delta x$ the probable region where they would need to be present if electrons do exist in nucleus.

$\endgroup$
1

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

In the uncertainty principle, $\Delta p$ is indeed the standard deviation, which is defined as $$ (\Delta p)^2 = \left<(p-⟨p⟩)^2\right> = \left<p^2\right> - \left<p\right>^2 $$ (where $⟨\cdot⟩$ represents the average value of the quantity inside the brackets).

Now, in the calculation you mentioned, we expect $⟨p⟩$ to vanish, because otherwise the electron would have a net momentum heading somewhere, and we know it is on-average stationary. Thus, the momentum uncertainty boils down to $$ (\Delta p)^2 = \left<p^2\right>, $$ i.e., the momentum uncertainty is directly related to the average kinetic energy $⟨p^2/2m⟩$. It is not the exact momentum -- it's just a direct metric of the average of the square of the momentum.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ So it is just the average of the square of the momentum, right? Can we then refer $\Delta p$ as root mean square momentum? $\endgroup$
    – MSKB
    Commented Feb 8, 2021 at 12:42
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. If $⟨p⟩=0$, $\Delta p$ is the RMS momentum. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 8, 2021 at 12:58
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you,sir. I guess they meant the same but did not mention these equations and their derivations as we are quite unfamiliar with these which resulted in the rise of confusion $\endgroup$
    – MSKB
    Commented Feb 8, 2021 at 13:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.