1
$\begingroup$

According to the original paper (Alfven, 1942), I would like to prove his final equation

$$\frac{d^2H'}{dz^2}=\frac{4\pi\partial}{H_0^2}\frac{d^2H'}{dt^2}$$

where $\partial$ denotes the mass density of the liquid, and other notations please see the attached pictures. enter image description here

My calculation is $$\frac{1}{\sigma}\nabla \times i=\nabla\times E+\nabla\times(\frac{v}{c}\times H)$$

$$=-\frac{1}{c}\frac{dH}{dt}+(H\cdot\nabla)\frac{v}{c}-(\frac{v}{c}\cdot\nabla)H =\frac{c}{4\pi\sigma}\nabla\times(\nabla\times H)$$

$$=\frac{c}{4\pi\sigma}(-\nabla^2 H+\nabla(\nabla\cdot H))=-\frac{c}{4\pi\sigma}\nabla^2 H $$ B=H in this case, it should be divergence-less too, and I assume incompressible fluid.

Take the time derivative again $$-\frac{1}{c}\frac{d^2H}{dt^2}+\frac{d}{dt}[(H\cdot\nabla)\frac{v}{c}]-\frac{d}{dt}[(\frac{v}{c}\cdot\nabla)H]=-\frac{d}{dt}\frac{c}{4\pi\sigma}\nabla^2 H $$

$$ {\partial}\frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{1}{4\pi}[(\nabla\times B)\times B]-\nabla P =\frac{1}{4\pi}[(B\cdot\nabla B-\frac{1}{2}(B^2)]-\nabla P $$

However, I'm stuck in this step. I know the $\frac{dH_0}{dt}$ and $\nabla\times H_0$ will be zero, but I have no idea to simply this equation, and especially how to eliminate the pressure term?

Thanks a lot!

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ there is a duplicate on math.stackexchange not sure if that user could solve this question but maybe you could try inquiring $\endgroup$
    – Dabed
    Commented Feb 10, 2020 at 3:16
  • $\begingroup$ I dont get why you have $\frac{1}{c\partial}(i\times H)-\frac{1}{\partial}\nabla P=\frac{1}{c\partial}((H\cdot\nabla) H-\nabla(H^2))-\frac{1}{\partial}\nabla P$, also I think $\frac{1}{\sigma}\nabla \times i=\nabla\times E+\frac{v}{c}\nabla\times H$ should actually be $\frac{1}{\sigma}\nabla \times i=\nabla\times E+\nabla\times(\frac{v}{c}\times H) $ and is not like you can't but $i=\sigma(\vec E + \frac{1}{c}\vec v \times \vec B)$ is like the Lorentz Force so taking the derivative feels a little weird and also because $\sigma=\infty$ , not sure what the correct way to proceed should be. $\endgroup$
    – Dabed
    Commented Feb 10, 2020 at 3:16
  • $\begingroup$ @dandide Thanks for the reminding, I updated the equations. Also thanks for the sharing of other post. $\endgroup$
    – Yui
    Commented Feb 10, 2020 at 12:27
  • $\begingroup$ reading wikipedia it seems the first four equation gives what is call the induction equation$ {\partial \vec{H} \over \partial t}=\frac{1}{\sigma}\nabla^2 \vec{H}+\vec{\nabla}\times(\frac{\vec{v}}{c}\times\vec{H})$ that is more or less inside your first lines so actually you only have two equation this one and the hydrodynamic one but as $\sigma=\infty$ then $\nabla^2 \vec{H}$ will dissapear and I don't see how combining this two will give the result. $\endgroup$
    – Dabed
    Commented Feb 10, 2020 at 23:05

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Thanks to dandide for letting me know about this question.

Let's first have clear Alfven's assumptions (I use bold only on vector quantities):

  • $\sigma \rightarrow \infty$

  • $\mu = 1$. Thus $B = H$

  • Pressure is neglected.

  • Density is constant.

  • The magnetic field is uniform and equal to $\mathbf H = H_0' \hat z$ (here I have used the previous assumption $\mathbf B = \mathbf H$ of course).

Thus, Maxwell equations simplify to:

$$\nabla \times \mathbf H = \frac{4\pi}{c} \mathbf j \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (1)$$

$$\nabla \times \mathbf E = -\frac{1}{c} \frac{\partial \mathbf H}{\partial t} \ \ \ (2)$$

$$\mathbf E = -\frac{\mathbf v}{c} \times \mathbf H \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (3)$$

$$\rho \frac{\partial \mathbf v}{\partial t} = \frac{1}{c}(\mathbf j \times \mathbf H) \ \ (4)$$

The issue with this exercise is that Alfven did not explicitly show the applied perturbations.

These are (note that the primes do not mean derivatives here; they mean small perturbations):

$$\mathbf H = H_0 \hat z + H' \hat x \ \ (5)$$

$$\mathbf E = E' \hat y \ \ (6)$$

$$\mathbf j = j' \hat y \ \ (7)$$

$$\mathbf v = v' \hat x \ \ (8)$$

Once at this point it is just a matter of combining and manipulating the two sets of four equations to derive the wave equation $H'_{tt} = v^2 H'_{zz}$

I will tell you what algebra I applied to get it in several steps:

1) Combine $(1)$ and $(4)$ to get

$$4 \pi \rho \frac{\partial \mathbf v}{\partial t} = (\nabla \times \mathbf H) \times \mathbf H \ \ (9)$$

Plug equations $(5)$ and $(8)$ into $(9)$ and develop the cross product on the right hand side. After doing so, equate vector components. Note that you get three equations; two of them are zero (the derivative of a constant is of course zero) and the third equation you should get is:

$$4 \pi \rho \frac{\partial v'}{\partial t} = H_0 \frac{\partial H'}{\partial z} \ \ (10)$$

2) Plug equations $(5)$ and $(6)$ into $(2)$ to get

$$\frac{\partial E'}{\partial x} \hat z - \frac{\partial E'}{\partial z} \hat x = -\frac{\partial H'}{c\partial t} \hat x \ \ (11)$$

By equating vector components you of course get two equations out of $(11)$; one is simply zero and the other is

$$\frac{\partial E'}{\partial z} = \frac{\partial H'}{c\partial t} \ \ (12)$$

3) Plug equations $(5)$ and $(8)$ into $(3)$ to get

$$E' = \frac{1}{c} v' H_0 \ \ (13)$$

4) Take the partial derivative with respect to time on both sides of equation $(12)$ and plug it into $(13)$. Such a calculation yields an equation for $H'_{tt}$ in terms of $v'_{tz}$ (recall that second partial derivatives are commutative here). This equation is:

$$v'_{tz} = \frac{1}{H_0} H'_{tt} \ \ (14)$$

5) We just need to get another equation in terms of $v'_{tz}$. This can be achieved by taking the partial derivative with respect to $z$ on both sides of equation $(10)$. By doing so you get

$$v'_{tz} = \frac{H_0}{4 \pi \rho} H'_{zz} \ \ (15)$$

6) Finally combine $(14)$ and $(15)$ to get the desired result

$$H'_{tt} = v^2 H'_{zz}$$

Where

$$v = \frac{H_0}{\sqrt{4 \pi \rho}}$$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Amazing! I got it, thanks a lot!! One more question: why could ignore the pressure first? $\endgroup$
    – Yui
    Commented Feb 18, 2020 at 14:04
  • $\begingroup$ great answer!,+1 $\endgroup$
    – Dabed
    Commented Feb 28, 2020 at 0:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.