6
$\begingroup$

I simply have no idea how this result is found $$I=\hbar \sqrt{\ell(\ell+1)}.$$ The result seems to just be dumped in textbooks rather than explained. I can get the result that $I_z=\hbar m_j$. Please explain as clearly as possible how this is derived.

Also, any pointers towards any books/videos that may help me learn quantum mechanics would be appreciated.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/148421/2451 $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic ♦
    Commented Apr 3, 2015 at 20:16
  • $\begingroup$ That's actually a bit of a thorny problem, but the gist has to be something like, "we get this equation for $\Phi(\phi)$, we can assume $\Phi(\phi) = Z(\cos(\phi))$ because on this range $\cos$ is invertible; that gives the associated Legendre equation in $z = \cos\phi$, then to get a proper solution we need (at least) $\Phi'(0) = \Phi'(\pi) = 0$, and possibly for other derivatives to also vanish." Those boundary conditions are pretty much the only things that can quantize the associated number to $\ell (\ell + 1).$ $\endgroup$
    – CR Drost
    Commented Jul 18, 2015 at 22:14
  • $\begingroup$ ACuriousMind's answer is correct, but is not going to demystify this issue for people who are not fluent in group theory. For a very rough, intuitive, visual argument, see section 14.2.4 of my book Simple Nature: lightandmatter.com/area1sn.html . $\endgroup$
    – user4552
    Commented Apr 21, 2018 at 19:15

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
5
$\begingroup$

This comes from the representation theory of the rotation group $\mathrm{SO}(3)$.

Quantum mechanics takes place in a vector space, and observables are operators on this space. The total amount of angular momentum is obtained from the angular momenta $L_x,L_y,L_z$ about the three axes of space as $$ L = \sqrt{L_x^2+L_y^2+L_z^2} $$ since that is the length of the vector $\vec L = (L_x,L_y,L_z)^T$.

The representation theory of the rotation group now tells you that the only possible values for $L$ on so-called irreducible representations, to which the states with $I = \sqrt{l(l+1)}$ belong, are restricted to $L = \sqrt{l(l+1)}$ with $l$ an integer. You cannot make $L_x,L_y,L_z$ behave as angular momentum operators (i.e. as operators which generate the rotations in the sense that they form the Lie algebra belonging to the rotation group) without $L$ taking these integer values. The proof of this is technical and found e.g. on the Wikipedia page I linked in the beginning, or, in another approach, found in my answer here.

The prefactor $\hbar = \frac{h}{2\pi}$ for $\sqrt{l(l+1)}$ is found by dimensional analysis and comparing to experimental results.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
5
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It's probably not as general, but there's also the fact that if you're solving Schrodinger's equation for a rotational system you'll end up with Legendre polynomials (or, in general, spherical harmonics), and if you don't quantize $\ell$ you won't get well-behaved solutions. $\endgroup$
    – zeldredge
    Commented Apr 3, 2015 at 19:03
  • $\begingroup$ Is it not possible to get this result from the Schrodinger equation? $\endgroup$
    – RobChem
    Commented Apr 3, 2015 at 19:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @zeldredge: Actually, the spherical harmonics(link to relevant part of the Wiki article) with fixed $l$ are all the irreducible representations of the rotation group, so I believe that is a fully equivalent way if you have a rotationally invariant Hamiltonian. $\endgroup$
    – ACuriousMind ♦
    Commented Apr 3, 2015 at 19:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Oh, I think you're right. Sorry, my representation theory isn't as good as it could be and I don't have good intuition for how it enters into things. $\endgroup$
    – zeldredge
    Commented Apr 3, 2015 at 19:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @RobChem: It is possible e.g. if you look at the hydrogen atom. You find that the solutions to the angular dependent part, the spherical harmonics, exhibit precisely the $l(l+1)$, but there it just kinda falls out of the structure of the solutions with little insight to it. The representation theory is the underlying reason. $\endgroup$
    – ACuriousMind ♦
    Commented Apr 3, 2015 at 19:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.