2
$\begingroup$

Imagine a massless and frictionless pulley with two weights hanging either side of the pulley by a massless string.

Like this except not attached to a ceiling

Rather than being fixed to a ceiling, the pulley is being pulled upward by an external force F, with the weights and string still attached.

Due to Newton's 2nd Law,

$\Sigma F_y=F-2T=ma$,

where $T$ is the tension in the string on either side of the pulley and $a$ is the vertical acceleration of the pulley.

Clearly, since there is a net upward force, the pulley itself will accelerate upwards.

But because the $m=0$,

$F-2T=0$.

Does this not then suggest that the pulley has a constant velocity?

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean by "not attached to a ceiling?" Are you saying that the whole setup is just free-falling straight down? If it's not attached to a ceiling, then what object is exerting the force F on the pulley? $\endgroup$
    – user4552
    Commented Oct 22, 2014 at 15:09
  • $\begingroup$ Clearly, since there is a net upward force, the pulley itself will accelerate upwards. Huh? Why doesn't the whole apparatus just drop? $\endgroup$
    – user4552
    Commented Oct 22, 2014 at 15:19
  • $\begingroup$ Someone's pulling the pulley upward by a hook of some sort... $\endgroup$
    – ODP
    Commented Oct 22, 2014 at 15:27
  • $\begingroup$ Quite clear by "a force pulls the pulley upward". $\endgroup$
    – ODP
    Commented Oct 22, 2014 at 15:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Good homework question in my opinion. Effort has been put in, and the OP is asking about a conceptual interpretation of their derived equation. $\endgroup$
    – BMS
    Commented Oct 22, 2014 at 17:47

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

In the equation $F_{net}=ma$, normally we would assume that $F_{net}=0$ implies $a=0$ on the right-hand side. However, for a massless object, we can satisfy the equation by having $F_{net}=0$, $m=0$, and $a\ne0$. In reality, of course, the pulley is not massless, so $m$ is small, $a$ is some nonzero number, and $F_{net}$ is small.

The above reasoning is the justification for the usual assumption that low-mass objects transmit forces unchanged, e.g., that the tension in a rope is the same value throughout the length of the rope.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.