Skip to main content
tried to make title better
Link
Qmechanic
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k

Heat Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian & heat kernel: Why do we need to substitute $s \to -is$ to continue calculating?

added 124 characters in body
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k

Starting from the general effective lagrangian for a constant background electromagnetic field, $$\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{EH}}=-\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}^{2}-\frac{e^{2}}{32\pi^{2}}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{ds}{s}e^{-s\varepsilon}e^{-ism^{2}}\frac{\mathrm{Re}\cos(esX)}{\mathrm{Im}\cos(esX)}\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}F_{\mu\nu}F_{\alpha\beta},$$$$\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{EH}}=-\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}^{2}-\frac{e^{2}}{32\pi^{2}}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{ds}{s}e^{-s\varepsilon}e^{-ism^{2}}\frac{\mathrm{Re}\cos(esX)}{\mathrm{Im}\cos(esX)}\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}F_{\mu\nu}F_{\alpha\beta},\tag{33.69}$$ where $$X\equiv\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}F_{\mu\nu}^{2}+\frac{i}{4}\varepsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}F_{\mu\nu}F_{\alpha\beta}}.$$$$X\equiv\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}F_{\mu\nu}^{2}+\frac{i}{4}\varepsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}F_{\mu\nu}F_{\alpha\beta}}.\tag{33.70}$$ Why do we need to substitute $s \to -is$ before continuing to calculate any interesting quantities like pair creation? What does this substituting entail for the underlying physics? And why are we allowed to make this substitution? After the substituting, the Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian reads,

$$\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{EH}}=-\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}^{2}-\frac{e^{2}}{32\pi^{2}}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{ds}{s}e^{is\varepsilon}e^{-sm^{2}}\frac{\mathrm{Re}\cosh(esX)}{\mathrm{Im}\cosh(esX)}\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}F_{\mu\nu}F_{\alpha\beta}.$$$$\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{EH}}=-\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}^{2}-\frac{e^{2}}{32\pi^{2}}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{ds}{s}e^{is\varepsilon}e^{-sm^{2}}\frac{\mathrm{Re}\cosh(esX)}{\mathrm{Im}\cosh(esX)}\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}F_{\mu\nu}F_{\alpha\beta}.\tag{33.71}$$

Reference: Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model, Matthew D. Schwartz, page 715.

Starting from the general effective lagrangian for a constant background electromagnetic field, $$\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{EH}}=-\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}^{2}-\frac{e^{2}}{32\pi^{2}}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{ds}{s}e^{-s\varepsilon}e^{-ism^{2}}\frac{\mathrm{Re}\cos(esX)}{\mathrm{Im}\cos(esX)}\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}F_{\mu\nu}F_{\alpha\beta},$$ where $$X\equiv\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}F_{\mu\nu}^{2}+\frac{i}{4}\varepsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}F_{\mu\nu}F_{\alpha\beta}}.$$ Why do we need to substitute $s \to -is$ before continuing to calculate any interesting quantities like pair creation? What does this substituting entail for the underlying physics? And why are we allowed to make this substitution? After the substituting, the Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian reads,

$$\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{EH}}=-\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}^{2}-\frac{e^{2}}{32\pi^{2}}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{ds}{s}e^{is\varepsilon}e^{-sm^{2}}\frac{\mathrm{Re}\cosh(esX)}{\mathrm{Im}\cosh(esX)}\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}F_{\mu\nu}F_{\alpha\beta}.$$

Starting from the general effective lagrangian for a constant background electromagnetic field, $$\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{EH}}=-\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}^{2}-\frac{e^{2}}{32\pi^{2}}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{ds}{s}e^{-s\varepsilon}e^{-ism^{2}}\frac{\mathrm{Re}\cos(esX)}{\mathrm{Im}\cos(esX)}\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}F_{\mu\nu}F_{\alpha\beta},\tag{33.69}$$ where $$X\equiv\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}F_{\mu\nu}^{2}+\frac{i}{4}\varepsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}F_{\mu\nu}F_{\alpha\beta}}.\tag{33.70}$$ Why do we need to substitute $s \to -is$ before continuing to calculate any interesting quantities like pair creation? What does this substituting entail for the underlying physics? And why are we allowed to make this substitution? After the substituting, the Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian reads,

$$\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{EH}}=-\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}^{2}-\frac{e^{2}}{32\pi^{2}}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{ds}{s}e^{is\varepsilon}e^{-sm^{2}}\frac{\mathrm{Re}\cosh(esX)}{\mathrm{Im}\cosh(esX)}\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}F_{\mu\nu}F_{\alpha\beta}.\tag{33.71}$$

Reference: Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model, Matthew D. Schwartz, page 715.

edited tags; edited tags
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k
Loading
Source Link
Loading