Skip to main content
edited title
Link

Tachyons as vectorsvector representations on the one or two-sheeted hyperbolas of surfaces transitivity of Lorentz group?

added 589 characters in body
Source Link

In Wikipedia's surfaces of transitivity (of Lorentz group $G$, it says

"Standard vectors on the one-sheeted hyperbolasone-sheeted hyperbolas would correspond to tachyons. Particles on the light cone are photons, and more hypothetically, gravitons. The "particle" corresponding to the origin is the vacuum."

By definition of the Lorentz group, it preserves the quadratic form $$Q(x) = x_0^2 - x_1^2 - x_2^2 - x_3^2$$ of the Minkowski space.

According to surfaces of transitivity (of Lorentz group $G$): If a group $G$ acts on a space $V$, then a surface $S ⊂ V$ is a surface of transitivity if $S$ is invariant under $G$, i.e., $∀ g ∈ G$, $∀s ∈ S : gs ∈ S$, and for any two points $ s_1 , s_2 ∈ S$ there is a $g ∈ G$ such that $gs_1 = s_2$.

I thought

  • tachyons are time-liketime-like, instead of space-likespace-like.

  • $Q(x) < 0$ is a hyperboloid of one sheet. Points on this sheet are space-like separated from the origin.

  • $Q(x) > 0, x_0 > 0$ is the upper branch of a hyperboloid of two sheetshyperboloid of two sheets. Points on this sheet are separated from the origin by a future time-like vector. $Q(x) > 0, x_0 < 0$ is the lower branch of this hyperboloid. Points on this sheet are the past time-like vectors.

If my understanding is correct, then Wiki's "Standard vectors on the one-sheeted hyperbolas would correspond to tachyons" is wrong, but "Standard vectors on the two-sheeted hyperbolas would correspond to tachyons."

=> Am I correct or incorrect?

=> Is the statement in Wikipedia incorrect? Am I correct or incorrect?

In Wikipedia's surfaces of transitivity (of Lorentz group $G$, it says

"Standard vectors on the one-sheeted hyperbolas would correspond to tachyons. Particles on the light cone are photons, and more hypothetically, gravitons. The "particle" corresponding to the origin is the vacuum."

I thought

  • tachyons are time-like instead of space-like.

  • $Q(x) < 0$ is a hyperboloid of one sheet. Points on this sheet are space-like separated from the origin.

  • $Q(x) > 0, x_0 > 0$ is the upper branch of a hyperboloid of two sheets. Points on this sheet are separated from the origin by a future time-like vector. $Q(x) > 0, x_0 < 0$ is the lower branch of this hyperboloid. Points on this sheet are the past time-like vectors.

If my understanding is correct, then Wiki's "Standard vectors on the one-sheeted hyperbolas would correspond to tachyons" is wrong, but "Standard vectors on the two-sheeted hyperbolas would correspond to tachyons."

=> Am I correct or incorrect?

In Wikipedia's surfaces of transitivity (of Lorentz group $G$, it says

"Standard vectors on the one-sheeted hyperbolas would correspond to tachyons. Particles on the light cone are photons, and more hypothetically, gravitons. The "particle" corresponding to the origin is the vacuum."

By definition of the Lorentz group, it preserves the quadratic form $$Q(x) = x_0^2 - x_1^2 - x_2^2 - x_3^2$$ of the Minkowski space.

According to surfaces of transitivity (of Lorentz group $G$): If a group $G$ acts on a space $V$, then a surface $S ⊂ V$ is a surface of transitivity if $S$ is invariant under $G$, i.e., $∀ g ∈ G$, $∀s ∈ S : gs ∈ S$, and for any two points $ s_1 , s_2 ∈ S$ there is a $g ∈ G$ such that $gs_1 = s_2$.

I thought

  • tachyons are time-like, instead of space-like.

  • $Q(x) < 0$ is a hyperboloid of one sheet. Points on this sheet are space-like separated from the origin.

  • $Q(x) > 0, x_0 > 0$ is the upper branch of a hyperboloid of two sheets. Points on this sheet are separated from the origin by a future time-like vector. $Q(x) > 0, x_0 < 0$ is the lower branch of this hyperboloid. Points on this sheet are the past time-like vectors.

If my understanding is correct, then Wiki's "Standard vectors on the one-sheeted hyperbolas would correspond to tachyons" is wrong, but "Standard vectors on the two-sheeted hyperbolas would correspond to tachyons."

=> Is the statement in Wikipedia incorrect? Am I correct or incorrect?

added 2 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k

tachyons Tachyons as vectors on the one or two-sheeted hyperbolas of surfaces transitivity of Lorentz group?

In Wikipedia's  surfaces of transitivity (of Lorentz group $G$), it says

"Standard vectors on the one-sheeted hyperbolas would correspond to tachyons. Particles on the light cone are photons, and more hypothetically, gravitons. The "particle" corresponding to the origin is the vacuum."

I thought

  • tachyons are time-like instead of space-like.

  • Q(x) < 0$Q(x) < 0$ is a hyperboloid of one sheet. Points on this sheet are space-like separated from the origin.

  • $Q(x) > 0, x_0 > 0$ is the upper branch of a hyperboloid of two sheets. Points on this sheet are separated from the origin by a future time-like vector. $Q(x) > 0, x_0 < 0$ is the lower branch of this hyperboloid. Points on this sheet are the past time-like vectors.

If my understanding is correct, then Wiki's "Standard vectors on the one-sheeted hyperbolas would correspond to tachyons" is wrong, but "Standard vectors on the two-sheeted hyperbolas would correspond to tachyons."

=> Am I correct or incorrect?

tachyons as vectors on the one or two-sheeted hyperbolas of surfaces transitivity of Lorentz group?

In Wikipedia'ssurfaces of transitivity (of Lorentz group $G$), it says

"Standard vectors on the one-sheeted hyperbolas would correspond to tachyons. Particles on the light cone are photons, and more hypothetically, gravitons. The "particle" corresponding to the origin is the vacuum."

I thought

  • tachyons are time-like instead of space-like.

  • Q(x) < 0 is a hyperboloid of one sheet. Points on this sheet are space-like separated from the origin.

  • $Q(x) > 0, x_0 > 0$ is the upper branch of a hyperboloid of two sheets. Points on this sheet are separated from the origin by a future time-like vector. $Q(x) > 0, x_0 < 0$ is the lower branch of this hyperboloid. Points on this sheet are the past time-like vectors.

If my understanding is correct, then Wiki's "Standard vectors on the one-sheeted hyperbolas would correspond to tachyons" is wrong, but "Standard vectors on the two-sheeted hyperbolas would correspond to tachyons."

=> Am I correct or incorrect?

Tachyons as vectors on the one or two-sheeted hyperbolas of surfaces transitivity of Lorentz group?

In Wikipedia's  surfaces of transitivity (of Lorentz group $G$, it says

"Standard vectors on the one-sheeted hyperbolas would correspond to tachyons. Particles on the light cone are photons, and more hypothetically, gravitons. The "particle" corresponding to the origin is the vacuum."

I thought

  • tachyons are time-like instead of space-like.

  • $Q(x) < 0$ is a hyperboloid of one sheet. Points on this sheet are space-like separated from the origin.

  • $Q(x) > 0, x_0 > 0$ is the upper branch of a hyperboloid of two sheets. Points on this sheet are separated from the origin by a future time-like vector. $Q(x) > 0, x_0 < 0$ is the lower branch of this hyperboloid. Points on this sheet are the past time-like vectors.

If my understanding is correct, then Wiki's "Standard vectors on the one-sheeted hyperbolas would correspond to tachyons" is wrong, but "Standard vectors on the two-sheeted hyperbolas would correspond to tachyons."

=> Am I correct or incorrect?

Source Link
Loading