awarded
revised
WKB Approximation of the Quasinormal Mode Spectrum of the Poschl-Teller (PT) Potential
deleted 1 character in body
Loading…
awarded
revised
WKB Approximation of the Quasinormal Mode Spectrum of the Poschl-Teller (PT) Potential
added 1 character in body
Loading…
revised
WKB Approximation of the Quasinormal Mode Spectrum of the Poschl-Teller (PT) Potential
added 5 characters in body
Loading…
revised
WKB Approximation of the Quasinormal Mode Spectrum of the Poschl-Teller (PT) Potential
deleted 6 characters in body
Loading…
revised
WKB Approximation of the Quasinormal Mode Spectrum of the Poschl-Teller (PT) Potential
added 2 characters in body
Loading…
Loading…
comment
WKB Approximation of the Quasinormal Mode Spectrum of the Poschl-Teller (PT) Potential
@mikestone I am interested in two reasons, 1 for a heuristic example to better learn how to apply the wkb method for QNMs, and 2 to see how accurate the WKB method is against an analytically solvable example. In the literature I have sometimes read that WKB is sommetimes "more accurate than one would expect". For better context I am an undergraduate research assistant in the field of black hole spectroscopy. The team I am on specializes in the continued fraction method, and is not really familiar with the WKB method. Also can you explain the significance of PT being "repulsive"?
comment
WKB Approximation of the Quasinormal Mode Spectrum of the Poschl-Teller (PT) Potential
Can you provide a link to some of the relevant literature? I'm very curious to see the methods and results. In Black hole Spectroscopy there are analytical solutions so I'm curious how the implementation is different in string theory
revised
WKB Approximation of the Quasinormal Mode Spectrum of the Poschl-Teller (PT) Potential
deleted 25 characters in body
Loading…
Loading…
awarded
awarded
reviewed
Approve
comment
Do I sum over these indices?
@FilipMilovanović yes this was precisely my confusion. I didn't realize that you have to expand it into separate expressions, then sum over beta. Thank you for confirming this as well, the responses have been very helpful in correcting this misunderstanding.
accepted
comment
Do I sum over these indices?
Aha, okay so this makes more sense to me. I appreciate your candor and feedback. I will set the question as answered!
comment
Do I sum over these indices?
So you must evaluate the free index before you sum over the dummy index is that right?