Skip to main content

New answers tagged

0 votes

Why aren't all black holes the same "size"?

In my view Conclusions from a Classical theory of gravity(general relativity) should not be made because at such a condition curvature is divergent and one should seek for a quantum theory of gravity ...
Aman pawar's user avatar
0 votes

Why aren't all black holes the same "size"?

The size of a black hole is usually taken to be its event horizon and its radius is called the Schwarzschild radius. It is determined by the mass of the black hole. Whilst GR predicts a singularity at ...
Mozibur Ullah's user avatar
0 votes

Why aren't all black holes the same "size"?

There is no good answer to this question yet, especially because none of the theories concerning black hole size differences take into account the evidence we have have collected, such as accretion ...
Jeff W's user avatar
  • 1
0 votes

Pole at Infinity of a 1-loop scalar bubble diagram

You have to think about it as having to deform your integration contour to avoid the roots $\alpha_\pm$. When you move along the real $s$ axis, the roots move as follows (the arrows indicate ...
Marcosko's user avatar
  • 382
1 vote

Why pole mass is physical mass?

A sketch of the proof for an interacting (hermitean) scalar theory goes as follows: Consider the two-point function $$\langle 0 | {\rm T} \phi(x) \phi(0) |0\rangle=\theta(x^0)\langle0|\phi(x) \phi(0)|...
Hyperon's user avatar
  • 7,298
0 votes

Is the size of a black hole singularity smaller than a fundamental particle?

The singularity is a point. Literally, according to current scientific consensus it is the 0 dimensional object my fourth grade teacher tried to explain by making a dot on the overhead projector… Mass ...
Matthew Moyles's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

Reissner-Nordström black holes and naked singularities

The Schwarzschild metric is $$c^2\mathrm{d}\tau^2=k_Sc^2 \mathrm{d} t^2-k_S^{-1} \mathrm{d} r^2-\mathrm{d} \Omega^2$$ for the metric on a sphere $\mathrm{d}\Omega$ and the “Schwarzschild factor” $k_S=...
controlgroup's user avatar
  • 3,347
1 vote

Does the fact that the general theory of relativity predicts singularities imply that it's wrong?

Isaac Asimov's The Relativity of Wrong is highly relevant to this question. If you live in an absolute world where a theory is either right or wrong, and anything that isn't completely right is wrong, ...
Allure's user avatar
  • 22.1k
1 vote

Does the fact that the general theory of relativity predicts singularities imply that it's wrong?

All models are wrong, but some are useful George Box We already expect that General Relativity is "wrong" in the sense that it does not have unlimited applicability. That does not prevent ...
ProfRob's user avatar
  • 136k
1 vote
Accepted

Virtual soft photons Weinberg volume I chapter 13.2

The soft virtual photons inside the diagram do not contribute to the $\frac{1}{q^0}$ pole. The reason is that the pole comes by considering a new contribution that looks like (using the $-+++$ ...
Níckolas Alves's user avatar

Top 50 recent answers are included